Just curious, did my site fall from #15 in 2009 to off the list completely in 2010 because of ailing statistics or lack of "substantial theological component?"

If the latter, what exactly is the definition of "substantial theological component?"

Cheers, and Roll Tide (that's for Jay and most especially for Matt).

No info from the conservative camp. The best we can tell, other than the Christian Courier, it's likely none would have ranked — although you really can't know without the Page View numbers.

And, yes, I'm a math nerd. I majored in math at Lipscomb.

There's something very odd in learning that all your work and time result in a page count equal to Edward Fudge's divided by 3 squared — as though the math predestines the outcome.

Holy cow, I was laughing when I read that part. I'm not sure if it was meant to be funny or not, but it cracked me all up! Just kidding bro…I wish my reading habits extended beyond the sports page.

Question: did none of the traditional guys offer their info?