The Fork in the Road: The Man or the Plan, Part 8 (Why Faith and Love?)

Well, I’m back from the Smokies. I’m scared to weigh, because I’ve probably gained a mountain’s worth of weight, as the trip was mainly about enjoying East Tennessee cuisine — breakfast especially. Oh, and to watch the UT football game. (Impressive stadium. Great crowd. Very enjoyable fans to hang around with. Tough first half.)

I’ve not had but a moment here or there to log in and check the site and comments. By and large, the discussion has been great. Thanks for the excellent comments — especially in my absence.

I need to dig a bit more into the faith-works issue and the baptism issue, but it’s not time yet. You see, we have to discover a few deep things about the scriptures and God’s redemptive plan so that we’re better equipped to have those discussions. Let me just state what ought to be obvious —

* I’ve read the many passages that speak of the importance of Christian good works. They are inspired, true, and ought to be obeyed. That’s not in dispute. Rather, the hard question is fitting them into a theology that keeps us from building a humanistic, self-centered religion on them. We’re heading there.

* I’ve read the many passages that speak of the importance of Christian baptism. They are inspired, true, and ought to be obeyed. That’s not in dispute. Rather, the hard question is fitting them into a theology that keeps us from building a humanistic, self-centered religion on them. We’re heading there.

But not yet. You can’t put the roof on the house until you lay the foundation and put up some walls. We’re building up to those questions.

Now, I want to focus on the question of why God has chosen to focus Christianity on faith in Jesus and love for our neighbors. The temptation is to just figure God makes the rules and our obligation is simply to obey — which is true but overlooks the understanding part. To understand what “faith” and “love” truly mean we need to know why these are commanded.

For example, when my oldest child has just learned to walk, I had to teach him not to walk into the street without holding my hand. I tried to explain to him about what cars traveling at high speeds do to a 2-year old’s body, the shift in momentum, the inertia of a two-ton vehicle, and all that, but as bright as he is, at age two, that approach didn’t work. I just had to discipline him so he learned that bad things happened if he tried to wrestle out of my grip to dash into the oncoming traffic.

But as he grew older, it became necessary to teach him the why. After all, he might have children of his own one day. And I certainly won’t be able to hold his hand forever. At some point, he has to deeply comprehend the rationale behind the command so that he can apply it on his own — and distinguish between safe street crossing and unsafe crossing. The why matters even if the command is very, very clear.

You see, the last thing I’d want is to create some neurotic child who’s afraid to cross the street even when it’s safe. Or a neurotically rule-bound child who won’t cross the street except at a crosswalk with a crossing light — because most streets don’t have these things. He needs to understand the purpose of the rule and how cars and streets work so he can go beyond the command to the understanding — because only then can he truly obey.

It’s not about getting around the rules or avoiding obedience. It’s about obeying the best way possible!

So faith and love are commanded. Why? I think the answer is found — as is so often true — in the Old Testament —

(Gen 1:26-27 ESV) 26 Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.” 27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.”

The original plan was for mankind to be in the image and likeness of God. Of course, we fell because of sin, as described in Gen 3, resulting in the Fall of Man and a curse on all Creation. God’s redemptive mission has been to reverse that outcome — so that his people will become like God. Really.

(Eph 4:20-24 ESV) 20 But that is not the way you learned Christ! — 21 assuming that you have heard about him and were taught in him, as the truth is in Jesus, 22 to put off your old self, which belongs to your former manner of life and is corrupt through deceitful desires, 23 and to be renewed in the spirit of your minds, 24 and to put on the new self, created after the likeness of God in true righteousness and holiness.

When we were saved, we were re-created to be like God. Now, notice that Paul uses the word “create” to emphasize that this “new self” is made by God in a parallel sense to God’s creation in Genesis 1. We aren’t just saved from damnation. We are, of course, saved, but much more happens than salvation. We are re-created.

(Eph 5:1-2 ESV) Therefore be imitators of God, as beloved children. 2 And walk in love, as Christ loved us and gave himself up for us, a fragrant offering and sacrifice to God.

Because we’ve been re-created into the likeness of God, we should imitate God. We should act like God. After all, children emulate their parents, and God is our father. (It’s a relational truth!)

How do we imitate God? Well, by walking in love, he tells us in v. 2. How do we know that walking in love is like God? Well, because Jesus is also like God and Jesus “gave himself up for us.” Therefore, we love others by giving ourselves up for them.

You see, it’s not just love in the abstract. It’s love like God’s love, revealed in Jesus’ love. It’s self-sacrificial love.

(Eph 5:17-21 ESV) 17 Therefore do not be foolish, but understand what the will of the Lord is. 18 And do not get drunk with wine, for that is debauchery, but be filled with the Spirit, 19 addressing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody to the Lord with your heart, 20 giving thanks always and for everything to God the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, 21 submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ.

Now, the Spirit is the Spirit of God. Being filled with the Spirit is to be like God — so 5:17-21 is an example of how to “put on the new self, created after the likeness of God” and how to “be imitators of God.” We submit to the Spirit’s work in us so that God himself, through his Spirit, shapes us to be like him.

We see the same thought anticipated in earlier passages in Ephesians —

(Eph 1:22-23 ESV) 22 And he put all things under his feet and gave him as head over all things to the church, 23 which is his body, the fullness of him who fills all in all.

The church is Christ’s body (and therefore in the likeness of Christ) and the fullness of Christ (and therefore very much like Christ because the church is filled with Christ).

(Eph 2:4-7 ESV) 4 But God, being rich in mercy, because of the great love with which he loved us, 5 even when we were dead in our trespasses, made us alive together with Christ — by grace you have been saved — 6 and raised us up with him and seated us with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus, 7 so that in the coming ages he might show the immeasurable riches of his grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus.

We are seated with Christ (on his throne!) because, like Christ and God, we will be kings and judges. (The link will provide additional support for this view.)

Also, to similar effect are —

(Mat 5:48 ESV) You therefore must be perfect, as your heavenly Father is perfect.

(Luk 6:36 ESV) Be merciful, even as your Father is merciful.

(Rom 8:29 ESV) For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers.

(2Co 3:18 ESV) 18 And we all, with unveiled face, beholding the glory of the Lord, are being transformed into the same image from one degree of glory to another. For this comes from the Lord who is the Spirit.

(2Co 5:17 ESV) Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come.

(Eph 4:32 ESV)Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.

(Col 3:9-10 ESV) 9 Do not lie to one another, seeing that you have put off the old self with its practices 10 and have put on the new self, which is being renewed in knowledge after the image of its creator.

(1Pe 1:14-16 ESV) 14 As obedient children, do not be conformed to the passions of your former ignorance, 15 but as he who called you is holy, you also be holy in all your conduct, 16 since it is written, “You shall be holy, for I am holy.”

Being like God is a major theme of the NT that we routinely overlook. When was the last time you heard a sermon on being like God? It seems presumptuous, impossible, even incomprehensible. But it’s quite plainly what the Bible teaches.

And so, why does Paul teach that —

(Gal 5:6 ESV) 6 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision counts for anything, but only faith working through love.

Why did God inspire Paul to pick faith and love as the two necessary elements of Christianity? What makes them special? Well, I suspect that it’s because faith and love are two words that very powerfully summarize what God is like.

Okay — I’ll admit that while it’s easy enough to see God as love, faith is a little harder. But that’s because of our misunderstanding of the meaning of “faith.” Define “faith” correctly, and it works remarkably well. We’ll get there.

But, of course, it’s also true that while we know we’re supposed to see God as love, we struggle to do so. We are afraid of God and sometimes see him harsh and unfair. Sometimes I think we say “God is love” is mainly because we’re afraid of going to hell if we don’t say the words. But we don’t feel them.

And this is one key reason why we struggle to be loving people. We don’t see God as all that loving. We sure don’t see him as having faith. Therefore, these seem like arbitrary commands. They are not. As K. C. Moser wisely wrote,

The “plan” theory regards any method of salvation as arbitrary with God. The writer has argued against this point many times. One speaker said: “God could have saved the world through Moses had he seen fit.” Others have confidently affirmed that God was not bound to save the world by the “present plan.”

It’s not arbitrary. Rather, our salvation is all about the nature of God — who is he is. If we knew him, we’ll understand. We don’t know him very well, and so we don’t understand very well. It’s a relational truth.

About Jay F Guin

My name is Jay Guin, and I’m a retired elder. I wrote The Holy Spirit and Revolutionary Grace about 18 years ago. I’ve spoken at the Pepperdine, Lipscomb, ACU, Harding, and Tulsa lectureships and at ElderLink. My wife’s name is Denise, and I have four sons, Chris, Jonathan, Tyler, and Philip. I have two grandchildren. And I practice law.
This entry was posted in Fork in the Road, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to The Fork in the Road: The Man or the Plan, Part 8 (Why Faith and Love?)

  1. Ray says:

    Jay,

    You bring up great points, especially about become "like" God (faithful, loving, perfect, etc.).

    It is interesting that you mentioned "Being like God is a major theme of the NT that we routinely overlook. When was the last time you heard a sermon on being like God?" I actually tried to emphasize this a great deal in my ministry, and Jesus' greatest commandment (Love God and Love others); I believe my strenuous focus on these concepts along with my lack of focus on "the plan" has resulted in me being let go and labeled as "he's not a church of Christ preacher."

    Your articles are right on the mark and very timely. Your comment (which I partially quote) "a theology that keeps us from building a humanistic, self-centered religion on them. We’re heading there." I don't think we are heading there, IMO, the 20th Century cofc's continued emphasis on "the plan" makes us where we have already built a rationalistic humanistic approach to salvation. The opposition found within the discussions seems prove enough to me. I feel that we (to use a phrase) "have strained the gnat and swallowed the camel." You are trying to help us see "what we have swallowed" and what we need to do to rededicate ourselves, for that I give you kudos.

  2. laymond says:

    "When we were saved, we were re-created to be like God"

    Jay, so many points to comment on, I will start by asking one question, "When were you saved, and how did it happen"
    The difference in you, and I is, that you believe you are already saved, that to me means you are as close to God as you will ever come. If you are saved you are already in the arms of God.
    Now I am looking forward to being saved, and taken to God, on that great Judgement day, and truly being changed into the likeness of God. That is the difference in your belief and mine, You believe you have already been saved, and I am looking toward being saved. so naturally "good works" would mean more to me than someone with your belief.

  3. Ray, you wrote:

    I actually tried to emphasize this a great deal in my ministry, and Jesus’ greatest commandment (Love God and Love others); I believe my strenuous focus on these concepts along with my lack of focus on “the plan” has resulted in me being let go and labeled as “he’s not a church of Christ preacher.”

    Your story sounds much like mine, and I am sure it can be duplicated many times. There are many, I believe, who in their heart of hearts know that the path we are treading is dangerous and unchristian. Yet, they feel they are virtually alone.

    It was a real blessing to me to find that there are others who think the same way I think. I see them on this blog and a few other places and I am finding more and more of them as time goes on. Yet, there are others who are desperately hanging on to the 20th century Church of Christ dogma. I see them commenting on this blog as well, but the majority of them are blissfully unaware of the arguments Jay is making here.

    Jerry

  4. guy says:

    Jay,

    Again, i find myself in agreement, but only with slight reservation.

    (1) i know i'm stretching your point a bit, but i think there's plenty of precedent in the Bible for obedience to God being significant *especially when you lack understanding.*

    (2) "Humanistic, self-centered religion" is really an unfair term. Who in your audience is going to say, "no, you're wrong, we DO need to build humanistic, self-centered religion!"? No one. Yet you've baited the term in such a way that now anyone who disagrees with your conclusions can be accused of this. Surely you don't take it to be necessarily the case that anyone who disagrees with you on the nature of works or some other bit of this is necessarily aiming or desiring or takes herself to be building a "humanistic, self-centered religion", do you? It seems like jargon that just panders to supporters and traps or badly-paints dissenters. Who gets to decide precisely what would constitute a "humanistic, self-centered religion"?

    –guy

  5. nick gill says:

    He needs to understand the purpose of the rule and how cars and streets work so he can go beyond the command to the understanding — because only then can he truly obey.

    Mostly, I agree with this, Jay. However, we still live in a warzone, caught in the last battles against Satan and his angels. In battle, while there are definitely times when it is profitable for subordinate leaders to understand the general's strategy, there are also times when it is fatal to wait for understanding before obeying. Part of faith (as I trust you will address) is trusting that God is fantastically smarter than I am, and thus that the Jesus Way is better than my way, whether I understand it at the point of conflict or not.

  6. Clyde Symonette says:

    Laymond:

    You wrote:
    “You believe you have already been saved, and I am looking toward being saved.”

    How do you understand the words, “will be saved” from Acts 16:30–31. It reads:

    The jailer asked, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” and they [Paul & Silas] replied, “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved—you and your household.”

    Do you read "will be saved" as eventually saved at judgment?

  7. Randall says:

    It has been a while since I kept up with the posts or the comments, but it seems some think more emphasis should be placed on Jesus than some general plan to save some of mankind. Of course that makes sense. It seems consistent with scripture that we are saved by an actual person rather than by some theory of practice or adherence to a set of rules – not to discount the normative response of belief, trust and faithfulness. A personal savior is far superior to a general plan.

    It also seems consistent with scripture that I – repeat I – was saved by a person – not some generalized mass of humanity who may or may not give a flip one way or the other about the savior. A savior that saved a very personal ME, knowing exactly what he was doing, is far superior to a personal savior who was in no way personal to me – as though he just tossed it out there for whoever may or may not respond. In that scenario it is possible, indeed probable, that none of us would care, certainly not enough to be life changing.
    FWIW.
    Grace and peace be upon you all.
    Randall

  8. John says:

    Romans 1 tells us that what can be known about God is plain, because God has shown it; that God's eternal power and divine nature are plainly seen through the things God has made.

    I realize that many who claim to take the Bible at its word are the first to say, regarding the verses above, that they do not mean what they appear to mean. The fact is they tell us exactly what God is. When nature is observed, when we pay attention to the communion of human beings, the very thing that stands out is that which Paul says is the greatest of all things, love.

    The problem that legalists have with love is the notion that it lets people off the hook, that it is a "light" theology. Nothing could be further from the truth. The easiest religion to skate through is the kind where you keep the hook hanging for all who are "wrong on the issues". Also, in spite of dismissing the doctrine of "once saved always saved", the security enjoyed by many in conservative churches that comes with belonging the "Lord's Church", regardless of their secret lives, is very, very common. Yet, sad to say, the love that expresses the same grace to others that we expect for ouselves is not.

    The fear of love destroying the uniqeness of New Testement Christians is rampant in conservative churches. But, if you truly wish to stand out, try expressing an attitude of love toward those who have been laughed at and ridiculed from the pulpits and class rooms. You will stand out well enough.

  9. Bruce Morton says:

    Nick:
    I appreciate greatly your highlighting that "we still live in a warzone" and "there are also times when it is fatal to wait for understanding before obeying."

    The example of Jesus' earthly ministry and His words recorded in John 14:30-31 should give us pause. The Son under siege guides us regarding faith, love and obedience.

    In Christ
    Bruce Morton
    Katy, Texas
    [email protected]

Comments are closed.