N. T. Wright’s The Day the Revolution Began, Romans Reconsidered, Part 40 (Summary)

dayrevolutionbegan

N. T. “Tom” Wright has just released another paradigm-shifting book suggesting a new, more scriptural way of understanding the atonement, The Day the Revolution Began: Reconsidering the Meaning of Jesus’s Crucifixion. Wright delves deeply into how the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus accomplish our salvation.

Summary

The second half of chapter 5 deals with salvation history, filling in gaps remaining after chapters 1 – 4. It should never be read as though the earlier chapters hadn’t already been penned by Paul.

When we read the text in the New Perspective way, that is, in light of the ancient covenants between God and Israel, the Calvinist issues evaporate. Paul is simply not talking about “Original Sin.” He’s clear that humanity inherits Adam’s propensity to sin, but not that we inherit the guilt of his sin. That’s just not the point being addressed.

Rather, Paul is trying to explain how it is that both Jews and Gentiles need a Savior, both are saved by faith in/faithfulness to/trust in Jesus — the Messiah and Lord. He’s continuing to show how God has been faithful to his covenants — saving the Jews with faith by faith.

But he also shows that God is not at all the wrathful deity of the Romans Road theory of atonement. Not only does God take the initiative to save, God forgives the faithful Jews with “abounding” grace — so that he can bless them with a greater revelation about himself without damning them all. After all, the more God shares about himself — surely a blessing — the harder it is for us to live up to his wondrous, beautiful image. We know that we need to be restored to the image of God, and yet the more we learn about God, the more impossible it seems to be to actually achieve. The solution? Grace abounding.

Now this grace is, in some sense, through Jesus the King our Lord. But Jesus is in some sense a part of God — and our minds are just not wired to fully comprehend the Trinity or even the Nicene Creed. Putting words to the marvels of the Trinity does not really explain it. It just gives us a vocabulary to help us express our amazement.

We learn that Jesus reverses not only the curse of the Exile (covered by Paul in earlier chapters) but also the curse of Gen 3. Thus, both Gentiles and Jews are cleansed by the blood of Christ and so allowed to approach him as the mercy seat of God — the place not only of atonement but of God’s very presence.

Now, the second half of chapter 5 is not a complete lesson. The rest of Romans is heavily built on many themes barely introduced here. We cannot stop so early in the book (despite spending so many words on explaining this as best I can). After all, we’re coming up on chapter 6, which begins with a section on baptism. What kind of Church of Christ expositor would I be if I stopped here?

But let’s also not forget the first half of chapter 5 — which tells us about God’s work in our hearts through the Spirit to fulfill the promise of Deu 30:6 to pour out the love of God into our hearts through the Spirit.

And perhaps even more important are the “much more” passages that tell us that now that we’ve been saved, God will “much more” reconcile us to him. His forgiveness will be much more accessible. As members of his family, while the standards do get higher, because of his abounding grace, the grace is “much more” greater. We should rest assured not only of God’s love but his willingness to forgive. His goal is our salvation. He’s not looking to trap us into damnation. Rather, he’s looking for ways to save us despite our best efforts to mess up.

Profile photo of Jay Guin

About Jay F Guin

My name is Jay Guin, and I’m a retired elder. I wrote The Holy Spirit and Revolutionary Grace about 18 years ago. I’ve spoken at the Pepperdine, Lipscomb, ACU, Harding, and Tulsa lectureships and at ElderLink. My wife’s name is Denise, and I have four sons, Chris, Jonathan, Tyler, and Philip. I have two grandchildren. And I practice law.
This entry was posted in N. T. Wright's The Day the Revolution Began, N. T. Wright's The Day the Revolution Began, Romans, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to N. T. Wright’s The Day the Revolution Began, Romans Reconsidered, Part 40 (Summary)

  1. Bryant Evans says:

    Just wanted to say thanks for the N.T. Wright review. I have revolution on my desk and will begin it as soon as I finish Suprised by Hope. I find Wright to be dedicated to the Scriptures although there are still places that we disagree. I figure a disagreement is a fine hook for a new study!

  2. Alabama John says:

    Bottom line after being a member of the Church of Christ for over 70 years and seeing the main rules called commands or inferences CENI for salvation changing every few years is “Trust God to do the right thing using His grace and mercy by everyone that has ever lived”.
    No one was put here on this earth by an all knowing God knowing they would not have a chance and were destined for hell from their beginning.
    If we really believe that, all the rest of the bible will make far more sense than all the arguing over picked out scriptures.

  3. Profile photo of Jay Guin Jay Guin says:

    Bryant,

    Delighted to be of service. As I note throughout the series, there are places where I disagree with Wright as well. For that matter, Wright admits that his views have changed in some areas. I found this book difficult to follow in places, and so this series is my way of testing/understanding what Wright says on some topics. And I’ve learned a lot putting it together. Hope it’s being helpful to others.

    BTW, Surprised by Hope is a very important work. I disagree with Wright’s views on damnation and hell (I find Edward Fudge to be much truer to the scriptures), but think he’s pretty much right about heaven and the New Heavens and New Earth. I’ve done several series on the NHNE, and the more I study the scriptures, the more certain I am that Wright is right.

    OTOH, Wright is not nearly as revolutionary as many think. If ind plenty of mainstream commentaries from the last 50 years that teach the same thing regarding the NHNE. It’s just that these commentaries failed to impact mainstream assumptions or the pulpits. Wright’s skill as a popular writer accompanied with his scholarship finally brought the question mainstream.

Leave a Reply