Sara Barton: On Bibliolatry

sarabartonI’m continuing to explore the world of Wineskins featured authors. Today I’ve been poking around the website for Sara Barton, a professor of English and Religion at Rochester College.

And, well, this is a little intimidating. I mean, I’ve taken English courses. Lots of them. And I have not a single pleasant memory of a college-level English course. None. Zilch. In fact, I keep thinking I’m going to be marked down a letter grade for a mispelled misspelled word. I mean, I’m typing in terrer terror.

So this is a struggle for me. Despite the winsome [Vocabulary word! Extra credit?] photograph of Sara — whom I’ve never met — I just have trouble getting started with the task at hand [Dang! A hackneyed phrase.]

So … anyway … casting aside all rules of punctuation because, dang it!, I’m 59 and not in her English class and really just don’t care what she thinks about my grammar …

She’s really quite a fine writer. Here’s a sample from May 2013.

_________________________

The Bible is a flesh and blood story. Now, when I refer to the Bible as a story, I don’t mean fictional or made up.  I mean that it makes sense with a unified plot from beginning to end, and we understand it best when we understand the whole story, not when we take small bits out of context without keeping the rest in mind.

The Bible is a grand story telling us how God did not give up on human beings when we rejected heaven’s way of doing things; instead God became one of us, and showed us what it’s like when heaven comes to earth in flesh and blood. …

I tell you.  I love this story.

I love it so much that I have a confession: Sometimes I am more comfortable loving the story than I am loving the one to whom it points and the people he calls me to embrace.  Bibliolatry describes people who hold to such high view of the Bible and perhaps biblical interpretation that they stop seeing God because they can’t stop looking at the book that points to God.

I think it’s almost impossible to grow up in the Stone-Campbell Movement of my heritage without a tension with bibliolatry.  We love the Book.  But, here’s the thing:  sometimes I think we love our interpretation of the book more than we actually love the Book itself.  And that is actually self-idolatry.  So, when I’m honest, my confession is not only bibliolatry, but self-idolatry. I really like my interpretation of the Bible; sometimes I love it more than I love my brothers and sisters in Christ who interpret the Bible differently – and that’s not a life shaped by the cross, shaped by the flesh and blood of Jesus when heaven came to earth.

At times, I am tempted to love my interpretation more than I love God.  Even calling it my interpretation is a bad starting point.  Nothing about God’s story was meant to have a first-person pronoun attached to it. …

Sometimes I need a reminder that it’s Jesus I’m following, not my own interpretation of the Bible.  And when others in the body of Christ don’t agree with me, I shouldn’t make it about me.  Finding this balance between believing wholeheartedly in the importance of full gender inclusion in church ministries and respecting my brothers and sisters who see it differently is making me more like Jesus.

But it’s terribly hard sometimes — something like eating flesh and drinking blood.

______________________________

Wow! And she uses dashes and italics and starts sentences with coordinate conjunctions. Like me.

You see, anyone can follow the rules. The art is in knowing when and how to break the rules. And how to say something worth someone else’s reading.

Good writing only comes from good thinking. Organized writing only comes from an organized mind. And the rules are there just so the grammar doesn’t get in the way of readers’ hearing your thoughts. Really.

Often the best writing is self-revelatory. And Sara shows herself quite the craftsman by using her own revealed weaknesses to help me and her other readers see our own flaws. She confesses sin in hopes that I’ll see the same sins in myself. That’s courageous and loving. Indeed, she sacrifices herself for the sake of the readers. And that makes for Christian writing.

And so. Like I said. She’s really a fine writer.

About Jay F Guin

My name is Jay Guin, and I’m a retired elder. I wrote The Holy Spirit and Revolutionary Grace about 18 years ago. I’ve spoken at the Pepperdine, Lipscomb, ACU, Harding, and Tulsa lectureships and at ElderLink. My wife’s name is Denise, and I have four sons, Chris, Jonathan, Tyler, and Philip. I have two grandchildren. And I practice law.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Sara Barton: On Bibliolatry

  1. mark says:

    She has also been named the chaplain at pepperdine and preaches too.

  2. Skip says:

    She sums it up quite nicely. The CoC is guilty of pervasive Bibliotatry. “Hey we know the word so well, we have to be right”

  3. mark says:

    Knowing it does not guarantee being able to practice it, or “reduction to practice” for those in patenting.

  4. The difference between the sermon and the essay is important. “To fix the thoughts by writing, and subject them to frequent examinations and reviews, is the best method of enabling the mind to detect its own sophisms, and keep it on guard against the fallacies which it practises on others: in conversation we naturally diffuse our thoughts, and in writing we contract them; method is the excellence of writing, and unconstraint the grace of conversation.” –Samuel Johnson

  5. Raymond Gonzalez says:

    Old problem.. John 5:39

  6. rich constant says:

    boy oh boy what I’ve always found out, especially when I’m dealing with how much disclosure the father gives us in Scripture about himself, and his practice of being good to his creation, (wishing not that anyone should perish). but there comes that time when the iniquity of the Amorites become’s full. ‘there comes that time also when one becomes reprobate.
    there are also those words that say work out your salvation with fear and trembling.
    also words that say be not many teachers among you…

    looking to NT Wright we start to understand a little bit more about gods disclosure, not only in his judgment.

    but also in his Christ who’s sums up in himself the ethical and moral praxis concerning our new nature through the Spirit of God and set up this new paradigm that we should walk in it.

    I’m sixty six years old now…. been in the Church of Christ all my life…
    when it came to doctrine I was always right. and I was even honest enough with myself too know. love and the fruits of the spirit just wasn’t working for me,
    by any definition other than ” I was just a contentious ass.

    I finally figured out what my problem was with Scripture .

    some things are just too simple for my complex mind…
    or
    those things are just too complex for my simple mind.
    and my friends the journey continues.
    although I seem to be a little bit happier than I was about 10 years ago. it truly is a sad thing to rather be right than be loved.

    that works vertically and horizontally

    🙂
    I sure unloaded a lot of baggage

  7. Joe Baggett says:

    It is easy to worship the bible rather than the God who is revealing himself through it.

  8. mark says:

    The bible can also be shaken towards a congregation like an extension of an arthritic finger while threatening them.

Comments are closed.