Church Plants: So You Want to Start a Church? Part 6

Toward a Conclusion

It all fits together. But for those with a restorationist/patternist bent, the idea that there was but one church in a given city during New Testament times is a disturbing conclusion, because the Churches of Christ operate in ways that are very contrary to this pattern.

So what might be some objections to such an arrangement? Continue reading

Posted in Church Plants and Foreign Missions, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Church Plants: So You Want to Start a Church? Part 6

Ro-o-o-o-o-l-l-l-l Tide Roll !!!

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Ro-o-o-o-o-l-l-l-l Tide Roll !!!

Church Plants: So You Want to Start a Church? Part 5

[This is edited from an article posted a long time ago. It’s the foundation for the series, and its publication likely predates the involvement of many readers.]

Congregational autonomy as we practice it is not found in the scriptures. It simply isn’t how the early church operated. And while God grants great freedom in this area, I think, we’ve gone beyond the realm of the permissible.

Allow me to explain. Well, let Gregg Allison explain – Continue reading

Posted in Church Plants and Foreign Missions, Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Church Plants: So You Want to Start a Church? Part 4

Let’s take a fairly concrete example. Here in Tuscaloosa we have several hundred congregations of various stripes. There’s a congregation for every imaginable taste. We even have one large Baptist Church that has three Sunday morning services: organ music, symphony orchestra, and rock band.

No one congregation has become a megachurch (2,000 members), but there are several churches in the upper hundreds and a handful in the low one thousand membership range.  Continue reading

Posted in Church Plants and Foreign Missions, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Church Plants: So You Want to Start a Church? Part 3

As so often happens, reader Charles McLean raised some challenging questions in response to Part 1 and Part 2 of this series.

Most start-up churches (those words stick in my throat as generally oxymoronic) come about for one of three reasons:  [a] we don’t like the way our current fellowship is ruled, so we create one we can rule to our satisfaction; [b] we move to a place where no existing fellowship thinks just as we do, and we’ll not give our fellowship to people who don’t think exactly like us; [c] I want to make a living preaching and running a church, and as no one is offering to hire me, I open my own shop.

It’s a difficult challenge to respond to, for several reasons. Continue reading

Posted in Church Plants and Foreign Missions, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Church Plants: So You Want to Start a Church? Part 3

Churches of Christ: Bruce McLarty Named President of Harding University

Harding University has held a special place in my heart for some time now. Yes, they aren’t exactly on the cutting edge of the progressive movement within the Churches of Christ, but two of my sons and one of my daughters-in-law graduated from there.

And I’ve had occasion to spend some time in conversation with their leadership, including recently named president Bruce McLarty. And I’ve been well impressed with the university.

I even spoke at their lectureship once (on law) (although I doubt that it will happen again).

I have my complaints, mind you, but you really have to look at the big picture. And in evaluating an institution, that means you have to consider what’s most important. After all, no institution is going to get everything right.

Now, there’s been some considerable controversy lately about the direction of Harding. Continue reading

Posted in Fixing Our Universities, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Churches of Christ: Bruce McLarty Named President of Harding University

John’s Gospel: The Baptism of Jesus, Part 7

Conclusion

I believe the Son of God has been divine (a member of the Godhead) co-eternally with God. He took on human form when he was born to Mary, and in so doing, he surrendered most of what it means to be part of God. He became finite and fully human. And yet he retained knowledge of God.

Continue reading

Posted in John, Uncategorized | Comments Off on John’s Gospel: The Baptism of Jesus, Part 7

John’s Gospel: The Baptism of Jesus, Part 6

2 Peter 1:3-4

Let’s next look at the 2 Peter passages.

(2Pe 1:3-4 ESV)  3 His divine power has granted to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who called us to his own glory and excellence,  4 by which he has granted to us his precious and very great promises, so that through them you may become partakers of the divine nature, having escaped from the corruption that is in the world because of sinful desire.

“Divine” is the same Greek word in both v. 3 and v. 4. The NET Bible translators explain, Continue reading

Posted in John, Uncategorized | Comments Off on John’s Gospel: The Baptism of Jesus, Part 6

John’s Gospel: The Baptism of Jesus, Part 5

I get emails. This one is from reader and frequent commenter Laymond —

Jay, I tried to make this comment on your blog post, but was denied access, so I will
e-mail it in hopes of getting an answer.

You ask this in the very first of your post. #4 “So did Jesus receive his divine nature at his baptism?” and you were right to say “Well, nothing in the four accounts we have or John’s reference to the baptism in 1 John 5 say that.”

But having said that, John is not the only place we can look for that answer.

2Pe 1:4 Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises: that by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature,

2Pe 1:16-17  For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty. 17  For he received from God the Father honour and glory, when there came such a voice to him from the excellent glory, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.

Mat 3:16-17  And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him: 17  And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.

2Pe 1:18  And this voice which came from heaven we heard, when we were with him in the holy mount.

Mat 17:5  While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him

— the only time this statement is made, as far as I can tell is in —  Mat 3:17, Mat 17:5  and in 2Pe 1:17.  So when do you think Jesus came into “Divine Nature”?

(lightly edited for form).

I’ll post my answer in three parts.

Laymond,

I think the Son of God is co-eternal with God the Father, and so has always been divine (in the sense of being part of the Godhead).

Phil 2 and John 3:34

According to Phil 2, the Son emptied himself when he came to earth in human form.

(Phi 2:5-7 ESV) 5 Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus,  6 who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped,  7 but emptied himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men.

The Son was originally equal with God, per v. 6. But when he emptied himself by “being born in the likeness of men,” it was the Son who was born of Mary, not a mere human who would later become the Son. Rather, it was the Son himself who was born as a man. V. 7 is quite plain.

However, taking human form constituted a real self-emptying. “Likeness” is borrowed from Gen 1:26. It’s ironic: just as God made man in his likeness, the Son of God took on the likeness of man.

I would not claim to understand this transformation fully, but it’s obvious that the Son gave up some of the essential attributes of the Godhead. He no longer existed as spirit. He was no longer omnipresent. Rather, he took on the finitude of humanity. He suffered hunger, pain, and all the other vicissitudes of human existence.

On the other hand, the Gospels are plain that Jesus had miraculous powers. Whether he had these because he’d never given them up — because of his God-ness — or because the Spirit gave these to him, I really don’t know. We are told —

(John 3:34 ESV) For he whom God has sent utters the words of God, for he gives the Spirit without measure.

This is conventionally understood to mean that Jesus had received the Spirit in a vastly greater amount than the prophets. For example, the NET Bible’s translators’ notes state,

Leviticus Rabbah 15:2 states: “The Holy Spirit rested on the prophets by measure.” Jesus is contrasted to this. The Spirit rests upon him without measure.

The Leviticus Rabbah is an ancient Jewish midrash (commentary) on Leviticus. The point of Jesus’ having unlimited access to the Spirit’s power surely indicates that the Spirit is to be credited with much of the power evident in Jesus. In context, the point John is making is that Jesus’ words are authoritative because he came from heaven (John 3:31) and because he had unlimited access to the Spirit’s power.

Hence, John actually argues both ways: that Jesus’ words have authority because Jesus came from God’s own presence and because Jesus had the Spirit without measure. John doesn’t have any interest in picking one possibility or the other.

[to be continued]

Posted in John, Uncategorized | Comments Off on John’s Gospel: The Baptism of Jesus, Part 5

John’s Gospel: The Baptism of Jesus, Part 4

Conclusions

So did Jesus receive his divine nature at his baptism? Well, nothing in the four accounts we have or John’s reference to the baptism in 1 John 5 say that.

Moreover, nothing suggests that Jesus became God’s “Son” at that moment. Rather, we’re told that God testified to Jesus’ Sonship both at his baptism and by means of his resurrection. But that’s very different from Jesus’ becoming God’s Son. Continue reading

Posted in John, Uncategorized | Comments Off on John’s Gospel: The Baptism of Jesus, Part 4