John’s Gospel: Questions for John 1:19-35

PORTRAITS OF JESUS

Lesson Two (John 1:19-35)

John’s (the Baptist) Portrait of Jesus

The Prophet (The Christ)

The Lamb of God

The Son of God

 Introduction:

John the Baptist is introduced as a witness to Jesus in 1:6-9

What was his witness?

  1. Notice John said he was not the Christ, Elijah, nor the Prophet.
  2. Yet he was identified by Jesus as “Elijah” (Mat. 11:14; 17:10-13; Mal. 4:5-6; Lk 1:11-17; Is. 40:3)
  3. Why would John not admit that he was Elijah? Did he not realize that he was?  Was he concerned that they misunderstood Elijah as the same as the Christ? Was he aware of a “resurrection of Elijah cult” to which he did not want to be identified?
  4. The “Prophet” was from Deut. 18:15 (Notice how this is used with Moses and Elijah on the Mount of Transfiguration Mat. 17:5)  And this is equated to Jesus  in Acts 3:18-23, which is identified with the Christ (Messiah).
  5. John implies in his answers that the Christ, Elijah and Prophet that they are asking about is Jesus, the one who was to come after him, the Messiah.
  6. Why did the question to John about his baptizing connect to his being the Christ?  What does his answer tell us about Christ’s ministry and personality? (consider the significance of the Holy Spirit)  How does this relate to how we should do our ministry and be the people we should be?
  7. Based on John witnessed at the baptism of Jesus and his receiving the Holy Spirit, he testifies that Jesus is the Son of God.
  8. Why did he come to that conclusion?
  9. What has the Gospel of John said to this point about the topic of “sons of God”? (John 1:12-13, 18)
  10. What conclusions might be drawn from linking our “sonship” to Jesus’ “sonship” based on John’s witness of Jesus receiving the Holy Spirit?
  11. What implications of our “sonship” to becoming like Christ (Rom. 8:29; Heb. 12:1-13)?
  12. Then we have John giving the recognition of Jesus being the “Lamb of God”
    1. What significance does John give to this title?
    2. What is the Old Testament significance to Lamb of God?  (consider the Passover Lamb Ex. 12 and the sacrifice of Is. 53)
    3. How does Jesus as the Lamb of God apply to our becoming like Christ (1 Pet. 2:21)?

by David Bearden

Posted in John | Comments Off on John’s Gospel: Questions for John 1:19-35

Moralistic Therapeutic Deism: By John Frye

We’re reflecting on an excellent essay by Christian Smith, “On ‘Moralistic Therapeutic Deism’ as U.S.Teenagers’ Actual, Tacit, De Facto Religious Faith,” which I found at the website for the Princeton Theological Seminary.

Christian Smith wrote Soul Searching: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers, with Melinda Lundquist.

To make the point of the last post better than I can, please read this article by John Frye, posted at Jesus Creed.

So many people in our churches suffer alone. When we lose the ability to mourn together, we lose a significant feature of our humanity. When we mourn, we do not need “the bright, plastic cheerfulness of pastor or friend who tells us to cheer up ‘for everything is going to be ok.’” People and their pain need to be treated with the dignity they deserve. Jesus, we recall, was a man of sorrows and well-acquainted with pain

Posted in Moralistic Therapeutic Deism, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Moralistic Therapeutic Deism: By John Frye

Moralistic Therapeutic Deism: How MTD Destroys Christians, Part 2

We’re reflecting on an excellent essay by Christian Smith, “On ‘Moralistic Therapeutic Deism’ as U.S.Teenagers’ Actual, Tacit, De Facto Religious Faith,” which I found at the website for the Princeton Theological Seminary.

Christian Smith wrote Soul Searching: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers, with Melinda Lundquist

The Bible is bold and plain that we live in a broken world where pain and suffering are part of the human experience. Indeed, God’s people sometimes have to suffer more than others. Continue reading

Posted in Moralistic Therapeutic Deism, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Moralistic Therapeutic Deism: How MTD Destroys Christians, Part 2

Moralistic Therapeutic Deism: How MTD Destroys Christians, Part 1

We’re reflecting on an excellent essay by Christian Smith, “On ‘Moralistic Therapeutic Deism’ as U.S.Teenagers’ Actual, Tacit, De Facto Religious Faith,” which I found at the website for the Princeton Theological Seminary.

Christian Smith wrote Soul Searching: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers, with Melinda Lundquist Denton.

MTD teaches that God does not so much compel us to live a certain way as provide a means for us to live well. God gives us self-esteem. God gives us emotional health. God gives us good marriages. God gives us friends and happy relationships. God gives us congregations filled with good people who want to help us be better people. Continue reading

Posted in Moralistic Therapeutic Deism, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Moralistic Therapeutic Deism: How MTD Destroys Christians, Part 1

Moralistic Therapeutic Deism: A Moralistic Religion

We’re reflecting on an excellent essay by Christian Smith, “On ‘Moralistic Therapeutic Deism’ as U.S.Teenagers’ Actual, Tacit, De Facto Religious Faith,” which I found at the website for the Princeton Theological Seminary.

Christian Smith wrote Soul Searching: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers, with Melinda Lundquist Denton.

So what on earth is wrong with Christianity being moralistic? Aren’t we for morality? Could we possibly be against morality?

Well, it’s not so much wrong as the wrong direction. You see, for very good reasons our youth ministers and youth volunteers spend a lot of time teaching our teenagers about morality. After all, they have to deal with some very serious temptations and they need to know right from wrong, and they need encouragement to resist the wrong. Of course.

But it appears that our moral instruction has resulted in our teens seeing Christianity as the same thing as morality. In other words, they tend to conclude that all God really wants from us is good, moral living. He wants us to be good people — and if we’re good people, God will take us to heaven when we die.

The teens then notice that their Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, and atheistic friends are often just as moral as they are — maybe even more so. And so the teens figure that God will save them, too. After all, it would be so unfair to save a Christian for being good when even better people are left behind.

It actually makes quite a lot of sense — if you think Christianity is all about morality — and it’s no surprise that our teens often reach exactly that conclusion.

In many churches, preaching is mainly about moral issues — divorce, abortion, homosexuality, fornication, etc. It’s about how to avoid sin. And, of course, such instruction is important, even vital.

But if we’re not careful, we can let our zeal for morality become legalistic, that is, we can make it appear that we earn heaven by our good moral choices. And that leads not only to univeralism but to legalism, which leads to a certain arrogance that we’re truly good enough to earn heaven — or it leads to a very destructive fear that we’ll never be good enough and church is therefore pointless.

So if moralism is wrong, what is right? Well, faith. Grace. The Holy Spirit. The cross. Jesus. We often afraid to teach grace to our teens for fear that they’ll turn it into license and so sin in reliance on grace (a very, very dangerous path indeed). But if we deny our teens the comforts of grace, we necessarily teach them legalism, which is even worse than license. (The New Testament condemns both license and legalism, but spends far more effort in resisting legalism, perhaps because legalism seems so very Christian to many of us.)

You see, it’s only when we realize that no one earns salvation and that it cannot be earned that the pieces start to fit together. When we realize that God rewards our faith, not our obeidence, that we realize that being “good” does not and cannot earn heaven. It’s not the best who go to heaven, it’s those with faith in Jesus.

Now, we could go into this in great depth, and have done so here many times before. For now, just reflect on this. God’s goal in saving us is for us to become like Jesus. Jesus was, of course, highly moral. But there are many moral people who aren’t remotely like Jesus. Jesus was much, much more than moral.

Jesus’ emptied himself for others. He didn’t just resist sin — he actively worked to be transforming presence among others. He didn’t just empty himself. He emptied himself for others. He didn’t just obey God; he obeyed God as a servant of all he came into contact with. He taught and he preached. He touched and he healed. He brought change. He showed the world the true nature of God by being the true nature of God.

This requires morality, but it requires something far bigger and better. And so when we aim for mere morality, we aim too low. Even the pagans do that. They may disagree about what is and isn’t moral, but they try to obey their own sense of right and wrong. And that’s just not good enough.

Rather, having received grace, we must learn to give grace to others. We must be conduits of God’s love to the world. We must be on mission for Christ.

Now, Christian teens are often excited to raise money to defeat world hunger or human sex trafficking — but so pagan teens often do the very same things. Rather, when we Christians clean up a creek, we do it not as good people but as broken people redeemed by Jesus to transform this world for Christ. We do it in the name of Jesus, for his sake. Sometimes, that will conform to the world’s sense of right and wrong, and sometimes it’ll take us in the very opposite direction. But we can’t just do good for goodness’ sake. We have to do good in the name of Jesus — and that’ll invite persecution.

And that’s the difference. You see, real Christianity invites persecution — not always, but often enough to make the price quite high for many. And if we’re practicing a religion that is always applauded by our pagan, atheistic neighbors, well, we’re not practicing Christianity.

Posted in Moralistic Therapeutic Deism, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Moralistic Therapeutic Deism: A Moralistic Religion

Gone to PA

I’m heading off to Pennsylvania for a few days. I’ve been up late doing repairs on the website. I know there have been problems with the commenting software. I think I have it working now. Somehow, in the repairs I lost the ability to display recent comments — but that’ll have to wait until I get back. Otherwise, the site appears to be fully functional. Please let me know if there are any other problems.

Jay

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Gone to PA

Moralistic Therapeutic Deism: A Therapeutic Religion

We’re reflecting on an excellent essay by Christian Smith, “On ‘Moralistic Therapeutic Deism’ as U.S.Teenagers’ Actual, Tacit, De Facto Religious Faith,” which I found at the website for the Princeton Theological Seminary.

Christian Smith wrote Soul Searching: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers, with Melinda Lundquist Denton.

In what sense is the Christianity practiced by most of our teen and adults members “therapeutic”? And isn’t Christianity in fact therapeutic? Shouldn’t we understand that Jesus helps our marriages, relationships, and emotional well being? Continue reading

Posted in Moralistic Therapeutic Deism, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Moralistic Therapeutic Deism: A Therapeutic Religion

Moralistic Therapeutic Deism: The De Facto Religion of Many Christians

I’d like to draw your attention to an excellent essay by Christian Smith, “On ‘Moralistic Therapeutic Deism’ as U.S.Teenagers’ Actual, Tacit, De Facto Religious Faith,” which I found at the website for the Princeton Theological Seminary.

Christian Smith wrote Soul Searching: The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers, with Melinda Lundquist.

The authors interviewed hundreds of teenagers about their religious views. They concluded that the typical church-going American teen believes —

Continue reading

Posted in Moralistic Therapeutic Deism, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Plans for This Week

I’ll be traveling to Lewisburg, Pennsylvania to have treatment on my right hip. I have a condition called trochanteric bursitis.

“Trochanteric” refers to the trochanter, which is the knobby part of your hip bone that sticks out to the side. “Bursitis” is Greek for “hurts a lot.”

I’ve had steroid injections, sat on ice packs for more hours than I can count, and have rested my hip very diligently. Conservative treatment has failed. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Plans for This Week

For My Daughter-in-Law

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on For My Daughter-in-Law