I’ve recently read two books dealing with the nature of inspiration and how to interpret the Bible. One is better than the other.
The Bible Made Impossible: Why Biblicism Is Not a Truly Evangelical Reading of Scripture
, by Christian Smith, does an excellent job of pointing out the problems with how the contemporary church reads the Bible. He calls it “pervasive interpretative pluralism,” that is, Christians and leaders seem entirely incapable of agreeing on just what the Bible says, indeed, even what it is for.
Is it a self-help book on self-esteem? A political handbook for revolution? A political handbook for Republican values? A rulebook for moral living? A guide to finding heaven? Indeed, it appears that there are as many interpretations as there are interpreters. Surely something is desperately wrong! Continue reading
We’ve been so caught up in the worship wars over style that we’ve nearly forgotten that worship should be built on a theology of the assembly.
As Americans, the idea of valuing accountability and submission is entirely foreign. We are strong believers in self-determination, independence, and freedom — defining “freedom” as freedom from anyone else’s control.
I just finished the series (for the second time!), only to realize that I’d not covered the parable of the wheat and the tares (or weeds). And this is a popular argument for erasing the line between those with and without faith.
