Thought Question: Are the Churches of Christ Evangelical?

From Roger E. Olson

My experience over at least 40 years of paying attention to evangelicalism is that MOST Churches of Christ/Independent Christian Church people and churches DO NOT want to be included among the American evangelical movement.  For example, historically they have not supported Billy Graham crusades or joined the National Association of Evangelicals (although one small offshoot of the Stone-Campbell Movement is among the NAE member denominations).  Generally speaking these churches have stood apart and even criticized evangelical churches and organizations as inferior to them spiritually, theologically and ecclesiastically. They have often actively evangelized among evangelicals.

True? Are the Churches of Christ evangelical? Do we want to be?

Posted in Thought Questions, Uncategorized | 31 Comments

Acts 2:39 (“The promise is for you and your children”)

“The promise is for you and your children”

(Act 2:39 ESV) 39 “For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.”

“Promise” is clearly a reference back to Acts 2:33: “the promise of the Spirit.” And that makes sense, because this passage parallels such prophecies as —

(Isa 44:3 ESV) For I will pour water on the thirsty land, and streams on the dry ground; I will pour my Spirit upon your offspring, and my blessing on your descendants.

(Jer 32:38-39 ESV) 38 And they shall be my people, and I will be their God. 39 I will give them one heart and one way, that they may fear me forever, for their own good and the good of their children after them.

As a result, the Spirit poured out in Acts 2 was not a one-generation event! We have today the very same “gift of the Spirit” and “promise of the Spirit” and “baptism with the Spirit” as the original 120. (But we are, of course, very differently gifted.)

“Everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.”

Now, we get to a challenging passage! What does “calls to himself” refer to? Well, we obviously have to start with the Prophets, not Calvin or Arminius. The word is borrowed from —

(Joel 2:32 ESV) And it shall come to pass that everyone who calls on the name of the LORD shall be saved. For in Mount Zion and in Jerusalem there shall be those who escape, as the LORD has said, and among the survivors shall be those whom the LORD calls.

Peter’s earlier quotation from Joel ended with the first sentence of Joel 2:32. He now paraphrases the last sentence, and “calls” in Joel 2:32 is the same Greek word as in Acts 2:39 — proskaleo. It means to summon, and it’s never used of a human calling on God, but rather is only used of God summoning a person —

(Act 13:2 ESV) While they were worshiping the Lord and fasting, the Holy Spirit said, “Set apart for me Barnabas and Saul for the work to which I have called them.”

(Act 16:10 ESV) And when Paul had seen the vision, immediately we sought to go on into Macedonia, concluding that God had called us to preach the gospel to them.

In Acts, the word is used of God’s call to a mission. It’s not the same word as used by Paul in Rom 8 —

(Rom 8:30 ESV) And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.

But the interpretive challenge remains. Peter says the promise is for those whom God will call, that is, whom God will invite or summon to himself. (The ancient texts disagree as to whether “to himself” is in the original, which is why several translations don’t have the phrase.)

Well, it makes sense. After all, at this point in history, God has only called the Jews and, so far, only the Jews in Jerusalem. The call will be expanded, as Acts will soon tell us. But the promise is only for those who are called — but, of course, those who are called must respond in faith. And not all the Jews present did.

Questions:

  • If the Spirit is promised to all generations, why aren’t the Spirit’s gifts as spectacular as they were back then? God continued to do miracles after the Exodus, but did he continually do miracles? Did he do them on request — every time?
  • Why does God something answer prayers and sometimes choose not to do so?
  • What is the purpose of a miracle? If it’s to show God’s glory, then how often are miracles necessary?
  • What does it mean to be “called” in this Acts 2:39 sense? If God “summons” us, what does he summon us to do?
Posted in Acts, Acts, Uncategorized | 24 Comments

The Fork in the Road: “The Way of UNITY between “Christian Churches” and Churches of Christ,” Part 7

Charles wrote,

I used to be mystified by Greg’s inhuman standard of “precision obedience”.

Charles and Greg,

Here is what I hear when Greg speaks of “precision obedience”Continue reading

Posted in Fork in the Road, The Way of UNITY between the "Christian Churches" and Churches of Christ, Uncategorized | 16 Comments

Gone to New Orleans

I’ll be in New Orleans, helping to restore order to the cosmos. Be good while I’m gone.

In the meantime, to help you get psyched for the big game —

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

The Fork in the Road: “The Way of UNITY between “Christian Churches” and Churches of Christ,” Part 6

My favorite conservative preacher and newly minted editor of the Gospel Advocate, Gregory Alan Tidwell, wrote,

I take no joy in our estranged fellowship, rather I am grieved not to have someone of your ability and character working on (what is in my view) the right side. Continue reading

Posted in Fork in the Road, The Way of UNITY between the "Christian Churches" and Churches of Christ, Uncategorized | 16 Comments

Google+

So I’ve been invited to join Google+ and I’m not sure I want to do it. It’s not that I’m anti-social or anti-tech. It’s just that I don’t want to have to check Facebook + Google+.

You see, to me, social software is a natural monopoly. Why do I want to be active on two services? What does it get me that Facebook does not?

Then again, I’d hate to lose opportunites by just being obstinate. But still, Google+ seems like little more than an annoyance — a requirement to have to read two websites to keep up with friends and family. I’m thinking of boycotting it.

What do you think?

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

The Fork in the Road: “The Way of UNITY between “Christian Churches” and Churches of Christ,” Part 5

My favorite conservative preacher and newly minted editor of the Gospel Advocate, posted a comment that prompted a response from me too long for the comment section.

Greg describes a visit to a progressive congregation 30 years ago.

“Just a minute,” cried a voice from the back of the room. “I don’t think we should say that.” It was one of the elders of the congregation. “Many of us have come to believe in the grace of God, and who am I to say that a Jew or Hindu or Muslim is not right with God.” Continue reading

Posted in Fork in the Road, Instrumental Music, Uncategorized | 270 Comments

Taxes for Missionaries: IRS Gives Grace for Failure to File an FBAR

A “United States person” is required to file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (“FBAR”) if the citizen has a financial interest in or signature authority or other authority over any financial account in a foreign country, if the aggregate value of these accounts exceeds $10,000 at any time during the calendar year.

“United States person” includes a citizen or resident of the United States, a domestic partnership, a domestic corporation, and a domestic estate or trust. See IRS Announcement 2010-16. Continue reading

Posted in Taxes, Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Rerun: Acts: How Football Changes Everything

[This is a post from the Searching for a Third Way series, first published November 2008. Some readers found this very helpful at the time. I thought it might be relevant to the current discussion. Besides, football is on my mind … The Objections section at the end is new, however.]

three.jpgI love college football. Doesn’t everybody? And it occurs to me that a football example would help make some sense of what I’m talking about. I mean, it’s been pretty philosophical — even metaphysical — to this point. It’s time to get a little more down to earth.

Consider the 1979 Rose Bowl. Michigan vs. Southern Cal. The game was tied late, 10 to 10. USC drove to near the end zone. The quarterback handed the ball to running back Charles White, and on the 3 yard line, he fumbled. The ball was recovered by Michigan. But the referees signaled touchdown for USC! The game ended 17-10, and Southern Cal was voted national champions — even though millions of TV viewers saw the replay and knew to a certainty that White had not scored. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

Acts 2:38 (“In the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins”)

“In the name of Jesus Christ”

Let’s begin by fixing the translation. When we modern Americans read “Christ,” we miss the point. Peter really said, “in the name of Jesus the Messiah” or even “in the name of King Jesus.”

In calling Jesus “the Christ,” Peter declared Jesus to be the true king of the Jews. Indeed, to submit to Jesus was very nearly an act of rebellion against Herod and Rome, because the Messiah was well understood to be a king. Herod considered himself “king of the Jews,” by appointment of Augustus Caesar. And the Jews couldn’t have but one king! Continue reading

Posted in Acts, Acts, Uncategorized | 34 Comments