Fun with Bible Translations

With the recent controversy over the NIV and TNIV translations (if you don’t know, don’t ask), Scot McKnight decided to match translations to types of Christians.

NRSV for liberals and Shane Claiborne lovers;
ESV for Reformed complementarian Baptists;
HCSB for LifeWay store buying Southern Baptists;
NIV for complementarian evangelicals;
TNIV for egalitarians;
NASB for those who want straight Bible, forget the English;
NLT for generic brand evangelicals;
Amplified for folks who have no idea what translation is but know that if you try enough words one of them will hit pay dirt;
NKJV and KJV for Byzantine manuscript-tree huggers;
The Message for evangelicals looking for a breath of fresh air and seeker sensitive, never-read-a-commentary evangelists who find Peterson’s prose so catchy.

What about the —

ASV (19th Century American Standard Version still used in some Churches of Christ)?

RSV?

The Living Bible?

The NETBible?

Phillips translation?

Others?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 14 Comments

Faith Lessons by Ray Vander Laan: The Presence of God

Sea of Galilee

Jesus made talmidim (disciples) from among the Jewish Galileans.  But eventually, a Galilean had to make a Greek or  Roman disciple.

Priene

Priene is a city in Asia Minor, near Ephesus. The lower city is the part that existed in the First Century.

In 1,000 BC, this city was founded by the Greeks. There were about 35,000 to 40,000 people there in the First Century. Paul traveled nearby, but there’s no evidence that an apostle ever visited. However, a Christian community was formed there very early. Continue reading

Posted in Faith Lessons by Ray Vander Laan, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

I’m Back … Sort Of

As predicted, the empty nest has resulted in a very long honey-do list and much less attention to the blog than before. (I wrote the Election posts the week before Labor Day.)

On top of all that, my computer is in the shop. Something about Norton’s and Google Toolbar not getting along. It won’t even boot in safe mode.

As a result, I’ve been commenting from my iPhone (nearly more trouble than it’s worth) and pushing my wife off her computer when not doing chores. (It’s hard to hide from chores while on her computer.) Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 6 Comments

Election: Romans 9, Part 4 (“But who are you, O man, to talk back to God?”)

(Rom 9:19-21)  One of you will say to me: “Then why does God still blame us? For who resists his will?” 20 But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? “Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, ‘Why did you make me like this?'” 21 Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for noble purposes and some for common use?

Unquestionably, Paul speaks the truth. God can do as he pleases. And God elected one nation (Israel) and not the others. The others have no right to complain.

But individual Gentiles had become God fearers and proselytes. Doubtlessly, many in Rome fit this description. God’s election of Israel and later election of those with faith leaves some out in the cold. True. But Paul is not, here, speaking of the election of individuals.

Paul alludes to a metaphor — God as potter, people as clay — used twice by Isaiah, in Isa 29 and 45, speaking of Israel (Ariel refers to Jerusalem) and Persia (Cyrus was king of Persia). Both times Isaiah is speaking of God’s judgment on nations.

(Rom 9:22)  What if God, choosing to show his wrath and make his power known, bore with great patience the objects of his wrath–prepared for destruction?

Notice, in fact, that Paul says: God can do as he pleases; and he pleases to be patient with those who deserve damnation. Even though God is entitled to make pottery for ignoble purposes (think about it: the Greek means “dishonored” not “common”), he nonetheless pleases to show great patience. Continue reading

Posted in Election, Romans, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 10 Comments

Election: Romans 9, Part 3 (hardening Pharaoh’s heart)

(Rom 9:17-18)  For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: “I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth.” 18 Therefore God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden.

Paul is quoting from —

(Exo 9:16-17)  But I have raised you up for this very purpose, that I might show you my power and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth. 17 You still set yourself against my people and will not let them go.

Notice, first, God’s purpose: to show the world who is God. Pharaoh claimed to be a god. Egypt was the most powerful nation in the world (or that part of the world). God wanted to make a point.

But let’s look at how God went about doing it. Continue reading

Posted in Election, Romans, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

Resource Materials: Tools of the Trade, Part 2

A reader asks,

Do you have a favorite New Testament commentary or do you prefer the book-by-book commentaries?  Also your current views on The Transforming Word: A One-Volume Commentary on the Bible (the inerrancy issue is not a concern of mine).  I am in need of purchasing new ones and would appreciate your opinion.

Sometime ago, I wrote a post called Tools of the Trade answering another reader’s question about how I do my study. I didn’t say much about my commentary collection, because, even though I have a pretty good one, I don’t use it that much anymore. The one I use the most is the New International Commentary on the New Testament. Most of these are quite good, even though most were written some time ago. Some of these commentaries have been highly influential. Newer commentaries routinely cite to this series. Continue reading

Posted in Bible Study Resources, Uncategorized | Tagged , | 9 Comments

Election: Roman 9, Part 2 (“I will have mercy on whom I have mercy.”)

(Rom 9:14-16)  What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all! 15 For he says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.” 16 It does not, therefore, depend on man’s desire or effort, but on God’s mercy.

Now, it’s critical at this juncture that we not jump to conclusions. Paul isn’t finished with his argument. Again, we turn to the context —

(Exo 33:17-20)  And the LORD said to Moses, “I will do the very thing you have asked, because I am pleased with you and I know you by name.”

18 Then Moses said, “Now show me your glory.”

19 And the LORD said, “I will cause all my goodness to pass in front of you, and I will proclaim my name, the LORD, in your presence. I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. 20 But,” he said, “you cannot see my face, for no one may see me and live.”

(Exo 34:6-7)  And he passed in front of Moses, proclaiming, “The LORD, the LORD, the compassionate and gracious God, slow to anger, abounding in love and faithfulness, 7 maintaining love to thousands, and forgiving wickedness, rebellion and sin. Yet he does not leave the guilty unpunished; he punishes the children and their children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation.”

Paul quotes Exo 33:19, in which God declares that he will allow Moses to see his glory, although this blessing is usually denied to others. But, in context, God isn’t saying: I have the right to refuse to save anyone I please. He is saying: if I want to bless someone who pleases me above others, it’s my privilege. Continue reading

Posted in Election, Romans, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 4 Comments

Renewing Our Worship: The Love Feast

I get emails —

Brother Guin,

I have been researching the subject of the Love Feast of Jude, mentioned by Peter and corrected by Paul.

I see in the scriptures what you discuss in your article. I have concluded long before reading your article that re instituting the Love Feast would greatly enhance the work of the church. So many are chasing after the joys of fellowship in many sinful ways. I see the Love Feast done properly as the answer to so many problems.

The difference between what we are accustomed to and what I see the scriptures naming and describing is what I have termed as format vs. setting.

In my research I have only found one historical document using the word Love Feast and describing it, Tertullian of around 197 AD.

Are there other documents of that era that are pro or con of the Love Feast?

I greatly appreciate your information.

I love getting questions! Continue reading

Posted in Renewing Our Worship, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 6 Comments

Election: Romans 9, Part 1 (“Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated”)

(Rom 9:1-4a)  I speak the truth in Christ–I am not lying, my conscience confirms it in the Holy Spirit– 2 I have great sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart. 3 For I could wish that I myself were cursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers, those of my own race, 4 the people of Israel.

When Paul refers to fellow Jews as “brothers,” he invokes a term that’s much more intense than for us. Brothers grew up in the same room, learned the same trade, and lived in adjacent houses (rooms, we’d say) until they died. It’s a term of great intimacy.

Paul’s concern is for his fellow Jews. Why? Because they (as a community) rejected Jesus.

(Rom 9:4b-5)  Theirs is the adoption as sons; theirs the divine glory, the covenants, the receiving of the law, the temple worship and the promises. 5 Theirs are the patriarchs, and from them is traced the human ancestry of Christ, who is God over all, forever praised! Amen.

Paul celebrates all that God has done from them. “Divine glory” refers to the very presence of God in the tabernacle and later the Temple of Solomon. The “covenants” speaks to God’s covenant with Abraham and with Moses. The “promises” are not only the Messianic prophecies but the promises God made to set things right when the Jews finally return from exile. Continue reading

Posted in Election, Romans, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

Election: Romans 1

Romans 1:18-32 helps to set the stage for the rest of Romans, and makes points about how God works in history that reverberate throughout the rest of the book, particularly chapters 9 – 11.

(Rom 1:18-19)  The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19 since what may be known about God is plain to them, because God has made it plain to them.

We tend to think of God’s wrath as something that happens at the end of time — and it will. It certainly will. But Paul says God’s wrath is already being revealed against all godlessness and wickedness.

He also says it’s quite fair because God’s may be known.

(Rom 1:20) For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities–his eternal power and divine nature–have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse.

Paul argues that God may be known from what he has made — just as you know much about me from my writing and would learn a great deal from a painter by viewing his paintings. (But that’s a topic for another day … ) Continue reading

Posted in Election, Romans, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 8 Comments