Logos offers $100 for referring a friend

logoshomepageI received this email from Logos:

It’s pretty simple—when a friend or family member calls a Resource Expert at 1-888-875-9491, they just need to say you referred them. Upon purchase of a new Logos 6 base package (valued over $500), they’ll receive 15% off and a $150 book bundle from Lexham Press as a special thank you, and you’ll receive a $100 Logos credit on your account.

So if anyone should decide to buy a Logos package for Christmas or otherwise, you’ll get 15% off + $150 in free stuff if you’ll mention that an existing Logos user referred you to Logos. So, if he is a Logos user, mention your preacher or youth minister or favorite missionary — so they get the free money and you get the discount and free stuff.

(If you don’t know anyone else who uses Logos, it would be okay to mention me as making the referral. I’ll not complain. But I’d rather you help someone in full-time ministry.)

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Salvation 2.0: Part 6.3: Baptism: Martin Luther and James

grace5Third point: I’m not arguing that there’s a missing verse that says “faith alone,” and I’m not under the influence of Martin Luther’s German translation. Rather, verses that say things like “everyone who believes” will be saved should be read as referring to “everyone who believes.” And Luther didn’t slip those everyones into the text.

(PS — As a matter of history, Luther’s insert of “alone” (in Luther’s German, it’s “alone” allein not “only” nur) in Rom 3:28 is simply not and never has been the basis of the Zwinglian position that faith is sufficient to save prior to baptism. Luther’s own defense of his translation makes for an interesting read, as well as an excellent introduction to the challenge of dynamic and formal equivalence in translation.) Continue reading

Posted in Baptism, Salvation 2.0, Soteriology, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Thanks!

Email subscriptions to One In Jesus have grown from about 1,000 at the beginning of the year to 1,500! So just a note to say “thanks” for reading and supporting this work.

It’s also interesting to study the national suffixes on many of the ISP names. The blog is gaining attention in several places in both eastern and western Europe, especially Slovakia, Poland, Germany, Italy, Portugal, the Czech Republic, France, and England.

This is very encouraging and much appreciated.

PS — I’ll be speaking twice at the Pepperdine lectureships next year. I’ll give more particulars when I receive them. I look forward to meeting many of you there.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Salvation 2.0: Part 6.2: Baptismal proof texts

grace5Second point: I know each and every Church of Christ proof text on baptism. So do the other readers. Please don’t insult me or the other readers by filling the comments with quotations of the very familiar baptism texts. (I’ve also read nearly every Church of Christ book and tract on the subject.)

Here they are (all in the NIV) —

(Matt. 28:19) Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit … . 

(Acts 2:38) Peter replied, “Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.”  Continue reading

Posted in Baptism, Salvation 2.0, Soteriology, Uncategorized | 20 Comments

Salvation 2.0: Part 6.1: Justification: Baptism, a Third Option

grace5

Justification

Baptism

I’ve written so much and so long on baptism that I really just want to hit the high points. Of course, when it comes to baptism, there are a lot of high points.

First point: It is my view that salvation and baptism normatively occur simultaneously. I believe that the Spirit is normatively received at the moment of water baptism. However, I do not believe that God is bound to damn when this rule is violated. In fact, I’m confident that all who have genuine faith in Jesus (as we’ve defined “faith” in the previous posts) will be saved. Continue reading

Posted in Baptism, Salvation 2.0, Soteriology, Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Salvation 2.0: Calling upon the name of the LORD

grace5

Chris asked this question in the comments:

Jay, what exactly does it mean to “call upon the Lord.” What Greek word is used here to denote this action? Is it a prayer? A plea? An appeal? Is it an outward display at all?

If someone said “so and so called upon the name of the Lord.” What’s the first thing one would think of?

Rom 10:13 “Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.”

Acts 2:21 “And everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.”

Acts 22:16 “And now what are you waiting for? Get up, be baptized and wash your sins away, calling on his name.”

Chris,

Very interesting questions. Thanks for asking. Here’s a rough, preliminary sketch of an answer. Continue reading

Posted in Baptism, Salvation 2.0, Soteriology, Uncategorized | 21 Comments

Salvation 2.0: Part 5.8: The end of Exile

grace5

Now, there’s more to it. Paul begins the discussion with –

(Rom 10:5-8 ESV)  For Moses writes about the righteousness that is based on the law, that the person who does the commandments shall live by them.  6 But the righteousness based on faith says, “Do not say in your heart, ‘Who will ascend into heaven?'” (that is, to bring Christ down)  7 “or ‘Who will descend into the abyss?'” (that is, to bring Christ up from the dead).  8 But what does it say? “The word is near you, in your mouth and in your heart” (that is, the word of faith that we proclaim); 

He is writing midrash on Deu 30 — Continue reading

Posted in Salvation 2.0, Soteriology, Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Salvation 2.0: Part 5.7: Romans 10

grace5

Inevitably, we have to cover the other text on which Walter Scott built his Plan of Salvation, Rom 10:9-10 —

(Rom 10:9-10 ESV)  9 because, if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved.  10 For with the heart one believes and is justified, and with the mouth one confesses and is saved.

Notice that our confession — the faith that we announce — is that “Jesus is Lord” but also that “God raised him from the dead.” We must believe that Jesus was resurrected by God. Continue reading

Posted in Salvation 2.0, Soteriology, Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Emily Roig: “Skin”

From the artist:

In light of the multiple church burnings that have happened in St. Louis city these past two weeks, I want to give away “Skin” for free exclusively here on NoiseTrade to continue the fight for racial reconciliation. All tips made go directly to support these churches in St. Louis. To learn more about what’s been going on or to give directly to this effort, please check out this campaign: https://www.generosity.com/fundraisers/support-for-st-louis-churches

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Emily Roig: “Skin”

Salvation 2.0: Part 5.6: Why faith in Jesus?

grace5

While Paul uses a lot of ink arguing for faith rather than works, he never really argues that faith in God without faith in Jesus is insufficient. To modern ears, that seems to be the obvious question.

We know that Paul believes this because his entire life as an apostle was dedicated to teaching Jews and God-fearing Gentiles to believe in Jesus. Why bother if faith in God would have been enough? Why bring salvation to people who already believed in God if they were already saved?

So what is it about Jesus that makes faith in him essential? Well, consider what Paul says in 1 Cor, perhaps his earliest surviving letter. Continue reading

Posted in Salvation 2.0, Soteriology, Uncategorized | 19 Comments