Replanting a Denomination: Two More of Hank’s Questions

Hank has a knack for asking worthwhile questions — questions that I’m sure other readers are also asking. To make sure his questions and my responses are seen by all the readers, I post my responses here.

Hank asks,

I guess it was because although I believe that we ought to “contend for the faith once delivered,” at the same time, I admit that to do so is not as easy as so many pretend that it is.

In other words, while I believe that there is a line somewhere wherein a person will be lost because of what he believes, teaches, and/or practices…only God knows precisely where said line is. My point is that we need to do our best to make sure we don’t cross it. (Because it CAN in fact be crossed). I do not pretend to have the answers regarding where the line exactly is drawn. (As so many of our conservative brethren pretend like they know).

I believe that we are expected to do our best to believe and practice and teach the “truth” to the best of our ability and that ultimately…God will judge.

Does that make sense bro?

Absolutely. I would only note two quibbles. Continue reading

Posted in Replanting a Denomination, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 80 Comments

Replanting a Denomination: Moser and Tidwell, Part 3

3. What was Moser’s view of the work of the indwelling Spirit?

While I have no writings of Greg’s in which he affirms a personal indwelling of the Spirit, my understanding is that this is his view, and that appears to be the sense of his comments here. The question on which most progressives and conservatives disagree, however, is whether the Spirit influences the heart of the Christian other than through the word.

Moser writes,

In designating the Spirit as the source of these graces, the apostle does not mean to separate the fruit of the Spirit from the person’s effort in whom the Spirit dwells. The person being influenced by the Spirit brings forth these graces. They are the work of both man and the Spirit, but primarily of the Spirit, because he incites them.

Through the word only? Continue reading

Posted in Replanting a Denomination, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 16 Comments

Replanting a Denomination: Moser and Tidwell, Part 2

2. Does Greg agree with Moser?

I don’t think so. Here’s an article by Greg for Forthright magazine, “Know the Time” (May 9, 2002).

Worship is changing. Congregations bring in all manner of deviance, pandering to every selfish whim. Entertainment replaces reverence. Emotionalism replaces obedience. The spirit of this age replaces the Spirit of Grace.

Church government is changing. Freelance organizations misappropriate the work God intends for the church of Christ. Mercenary professionals usurp the divinely authorized assignments of pastor, deacon, and evangelist. Congregations become fraternal societies, existing to meet the needs of their members. They are no longer a fellowship of God’s people, gathered in obedience to His will. …

Already much error, previously carefully hidden, now openly affronts the brotherhood. If the pace of apostasy continues, the division will be complete within the next five years. While we do not rejoice in the falling away of those who were once our brethren, we rejoice in the purification of God’s church.

Notice that Greg is warning against apostasy — sins that damn and take one out of the church. Continue reading

Posted in Replanting a Denomination, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 14 Comments

Replanting a Denomination: Moser and Tidwell, Part 1

Gregory Alan Tidwell, a contributor to the Gospel Advocate and my favorite conservative preacher, commented,

Please provide me with an actual quote from Moser with which I disagree. (not what you are SURE Moser would have said, or MEANT to say, but what Moser ACTUALLY said.)

I’m just a simple Midwestern preacher, but having studied Moser over the past 30 years, I am unaware of my disagreement with him.

Fair enough, except I’m a little bit of a disadvantage. I only know a handful of Greg’s positions, and so as to some issues, I’ll just have to ask Greg whether he agrees with Moser or not. Continue reading

Posted in Replanting a Denomination, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 10 Comments

Replanting a Denomination: Leadership during Stability, Decline, and Death

In The Life Cycle in Congregations, Arlin J. Rothauge advises churches on how to cope with stability, decline, and death. During decline or death, we are aware that there’s a problem, but when we’re plateaued, we tend to figure that we shouldn’t mess with what brought the original growth. And yet the best time to head off is decline is when plateaued, rather than waiting until things start to go downhill.
Stability and the Operator.

At this point in the life cycle the high level of energy and creativity recedes to make way for a growing concern for maintenance. The need for wise administration of the organization and preservation of the traditions requires the type of leader who can operate complex systems. However, “stability” becomes the first period of reshaping-in order to maintain vitality as well as continuity. Consequently, the best “operator” also will be a clever innovator.

All decline is preceded by a period of stability. We have to reach the flat, top of the curve before we begin the descending part.

There is a certain logic to the process of beginning formation over again. The probable steps are as follows:

1. Identity: “Why are, we in business? What are our assets and strengths?” Members rediscover who they are and why they exist as a congregation in this place and time.

2. Vision: “Where do we want to go?” Members reaffirm their obligation to become more faithful to their congregation as it could be in the future.

3. Strategy: “How will we get the job done?” Leaders reequip members and themselves with whatever it will take to reach for their new future. They plot and prepare for the step-by-step progress that will make the dream come true.

4. Experimental Action: “What are we ready to try?” Members choose the highest priority and closest possibility in their plan and commit themselves to a metamorphosis, one small step at a time until the dream turns into a revised vision or a full reality.

5. Reflection: Finally, “How is it going, and what’s next? Where do we adjust our course?” The congregation should always pause for thanksgiving, absolution, offertory, and celebration. The insights and prayers of the membership guide the evaluation of how they are doing.

Stability is not growth. Therefore, to re-initiate growth, you must begin anew. For a denomination, this means becoming a new movement. Rather than seeking to preserve what’s been accomplished — a defensive strategy — the question should be: what needs to be achieved now?

Decline and the Healer. When a group falls into decline, its sense of security gives way to a grief process. The behavior in the group reflects what happens in times of significant loss. Members might try to deny the difficulty, bargain with fate by reviving the past, focus too much anger on themselves, their leader, or outsiders as a cause for the hard times, and finally slip into depression, passivity, and resignation. In this grief reaction, the leader brings healing by understanding, absolution, encouragement, and innovation. The healer, like the operator, completes his or her role by bringing the group back to a level of higher energy and creativity through new vision and the birth of new directions A grief process is healthy unless some pathological extreme emerges. The healer brings balance and discipline to the grief work.

The Churches of Christ are in a time of decline. Mourning for what’s been lost is healthy — so long as mourning doesn’t lead to a fixation on the past. The cure is the same as for stability. It’s just that it’s harder to change in a period of decline because for many, change means defeat.

In the recent history of the Churches, it’s easy to find examples of denial, efforts to revive the past, anger directed at ourselves, our leaders, and outsiders — and even depression, passivity, and resignation. There are plenty among us who feel the situation cannot be changed and we should resign ourselves to the death of the Churches.

Second, decline and redevelopment entail, in addition to redefinition, the restatement of strategy and vision. More disturbing questions point the way forward when another frame of reference is needed. The congregation asks, for example: Why do we have this building and these traditions? Why do we have a pastor? Where is our neighborhood? Are we the same church that our founders envisioned?

In denominational terms, we ask: Why do we have these traditions? Why do we have the denominational leadership we have? Must we bend to the will of the editors? What is the field in which God has equipped us to harvest? Are we still the Movement the founders envisioned? Is their vision still relevant today? Do we need a new vision? How do we recast a 19th Century vision in 21st Century terms?

Death and the “Parent.” When the group moves from the critical phase to the survival syndrome, the leader finds the members exhausted with grief and immobilized by a lack of self-confidence. It may be necessary for the leader to become temporarily a “parent,” allowing extradependency upon their strength and optimism. The “parent” teaches the group how to “talk” again, how to “walk” again, and how to “grow up” into being a different group. Out of the intense care by the parent, a rebirth may come from the terminal situation. If not, the remaining members at least find the capacity to celebrate their past and accept the closure of the life cycle for their congregation.

I know that many have already declared the Churches of Christ, and certainly some of our congregations have died and others are on their death beds. But it’s easy to see signs of great vitality as well. It’s not quite time for the death certificate.

On the other hand, to come a vibrant denomination that’s effectively serving in God’s kingom, the denomination has to die — so that God can resurrect it. We can’t let nostalgia and tradition hold us back. Rather, as we must all individually die so that we can be raised in new life in the Kingdom, so must the Churches of Christ.

Death, however, doesn’t mean ceasing to exist. Death means submitting to God’s re-creating hand and letting him reshape us into a new creation.

(2 Cor 5:17)  Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come!

(Col 3:3)  For you died, and your life is now hidden with Christ in God.

(Rom 6:9-11)  For we know that since Christ was raised from the dead, he cannot die again; death no longer has mastery over him. 10 The death he died, he died to sin once for all; but the life he lives, he lives to God. 11 In the same way, count yourselves dead to sin but alive to God in Christ Jesus.

Posted in Replanting a Denomination, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 11 Comments

Surprised by Hope: 2 Peter 3:10-13 — Re-translating Peter

So if the creation is to be redeemed and freed in a way that gives it expectancy and even a groaning in anticipation of the end of time, how can it melt, be destroyed, and disappear? What if we were to read 2 Peter in light of the Old Testament prophecies he’s referring to as well as Paul and Revelation?

(2 Pet 3:10a)  But the day of the Lord will come like a thief.

So far as I can find, Jesus was the first to declare the unknowability of the time of the end of time (Mat 24:42).

(2 Pet 3:10b) The heavens will disappear with a roar;

“Disappear” translates parechomai,  meaning “leave” or “pass away.” It’s the same word Paul uses of our baptism, when he declares —

(2 Cor 5:17)  Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come!

Both passages speak of a new creation by God. And neither means that the old has literally ceased to exist. In fact, the thought is that the old has been radically transformed. Continue reading

Posted in Heaven, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

Replanting a Denomination: In Reply to Hank

Hank asked,

As a “Neo-Conservative” (dubbed that by a leading progressive), who is trying to follow along, I have to ask what is meant exactly in saying that we need to change?

Take, for example, the typical old school “sound” congregation wherein there is the following:

1. The women do not lead prayers in the presence of men. Neither are they elders or deacons. Neither do they preside over the “Lord’s Table.” They do not teach classes with men in them. They do not lead singing. They are not the paid preachers, etc, etc, etc,.

Would the need to change include changing the above situation regarding the role of women? If, so which of the above specifically? If some of the changes would be good and acceptable to God…are there ANY that would not and therefore be sinful? Continue reading

Posted in Replanting a Denomination, Uncategorized | Tagged | 41 Comments

Replanting a Denomination: In Reply to Greg

Gregory Alan Tidwell, my favorite conservative preacher, recently posted a challenging comment. It merits a detailed reply because he raises some important questions.

Jay;

You paint with a very broad brush. Among those whom you would call “traditionalists” there have ALWAYS been a sizable number who believed in the personal indwelling of the Holy Spirit and who taught very clearly the gospel of grace of God. Continue reading

Posted in Replanting a Denomination, Uncategorized | Tagged | 7 Comments

In the Mood … Final Reflections on Alabama’s National Championship

I miss football already. I mean, there are no more college football games to look forward to until August! (Is this an addiction? Do I need professional help?)

I have the good fortune of knowing many Texas fans. They have a huge fan base. I mean, any team that managed to survive the entire 20th Century undefeated by Alabama is going to have a huge fan base, right? And they are a classy bunch.

But, at last, the earth is spinning on the correct axis. No longer have we never defeated Texas. Finally, UA will be known at champions, not as a team that looks backwards to the way things used to be. (Texas can understand.) Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 5 Comments

Pepperdine

Well, the mail came the other day, and I just got my copy of the brochure for the Pepperdine lecturships. And lo and behold there was my preacher, Shon Smith, listed at the keynote speaker!

He’d been keeping it quiet, but it’s a big deal. As I explained to him, being a notorious change agent and all, he’d never be editor of the Gospel Advocate, and so, for a progressive preacher, that’s as big as it gets! Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 2 Comments