Note to Readers about Comments

I’ve removed the WordPress feature that allows multi-tiered comments, because many of us kept finding our comments in the wrong place. We are back to the old-fashioned, linear, one-tier system. Not the perfect solution but at least it’s predictable.

Therefore, when posting a comment in reply to an earlier comment, be sure to begin with the name of the person you are responding to so the conversation can be followed by the rest of us.

[The cat picture is for my daughter-in-law.]

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 2 Comments

Faith Lessons by Ray Vander Laan: When the Rabbi Says “Come,” Part 2

During Wednesday night’s class with the teachers and in reviewing the comments, it’s clear that we need to pick up a few further thoughts on the lesson.

Question: Does Vander Laan’s lesson lead to becoming a cult? Doesn’t this argue for too much authority in the rabbi?

It’s a really good question. If Jesus is my rabbi — and he is — what is the relationship of my students to me?

In reflecting on this, I recalled something I’d written earlier regarding the marvelous book Sitting at the Feet of Rabbi Jesus

His “disciples” weren’t mere students. They were devoted followers who studied everything about him so they could be just like him — in every way possible. When Jesus told us to go and make “disciples,” he didn’t mean great students or masters of discipline. He meant people who would emulate his teaching and his life. And this is precisely what we see his apostles doing in Acts.

(John 13:15-17)  I have set you an example that you should do as I have done for you. 16 I tell you the truth, no servant is greater than his master, nor is a messenger greater than the one who sent him. 17 Now that you know these things, you will be blessed if you do them.

To Western ears, Paul’s declarations sound arrogant –

(1 Cor 11:1)  Follow my example, as I follow the example of Christ.

(Phil 3:17)  Join with others in following my example, brothers, and take note of those who live according to the pattern we gave you.

But this is how rabbis taught. It’s how we should teach — and if we can’t teach that with a straight face, we need to work on our own discipleship. Continue reading

Posted in Faith Lessons by Ray Vander Laan, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Let the Games Begin …

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Comments Off on Let the Games Begin …

Instrumental Music: A Parallel Argument

Angel with harpI get emails —

One of the most popular arguments against instrumental music is that “the only thing that instruments have brought to worship” is division.  The person I’m discussing this with has 4 points, and I know that Corbitt discusses these in his book very well, what I am looking for is a parallel.

1. there is no command in the scripture for instrumental music in worship

2. it was not introduced into the church for some 600 years, it was tossed out the first two times they tried

3. it was introduced by an apostate church

4. it only brings division.

Q:  Can you think of anything that we currently do or practice in the churches of Christ that would also fit these, like the kitchen or gym.  I have gotten to the point where I don’t even bring up arguments when I disagree with things being taught, they are standard ‘doctrine.’

Any help would be greatly appreciated.  I do not like to discuss a lot of these things unless I’m really loaded for the task. Continue reading

Posted in Instrumental Music, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 58 Comments

Churches of Christ: What, Me Worry?

On August 18, 2009, Phil Sanders published these statistics at his In “Search of the Lord’s Way” blog —

Some Encouraging Statistics

According to Flavil Yeakley, who presented this material at FHU a few years ago, one can say these things about churches of Christ:

* 12th largest religious group in America
* 6th fastest growing church in America
* 4th in the nation in the total number of congregations
* 5th in the nation in number of counties in which there is a congregation
* 1st in the nation in distribution of congregations
* 1st in the nation in weekly attendance Continue reading

Posted in Churches of Christ in Decline, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 25 Comments

Neo-Calvinism: Conclusions, Part 2

The redemption of culture, science, and the arts

We see our job as being to redeem to people, and when we do, we don’t tell them much about God’s will for their job, their hobbies, or their role in society. We are mainly concerned with church attendance, volunteering for church ministries — nearly all of which serve the needs of Christians and their children, and giving money.

Kuyper realized that God reigns over much more than that. Science is God’s sphere, because science is the study of God’s creation. And we see this in the fact that science has brought vast blessings to humanity: prosperity, medicine, and so on. Not many of us would want to return to world as it existed pre-antibiotics and pre-electricity. Kuyper argues that these blessings are not human blessings. Rather, we simply discovered potentials in God’s good creation that he put there for us to find. Studying the good — the Creation — brings us closer to God, and so it’s hardly surprising that science has blessed those whom God loves.

Arts — art that’s any count — is about beauty, and beauty is a mark of God’s creative hand. The only reason we humans perceive some things as ugly and some as beautiful is because some things take us closer to the heart of God. Now, when I say art is about beauty, that doesn’t mean that all art is beautiful. Some great art is ugly, but it’s great art because it shows us the ugliness that comes from the absence of God or the need for God’s work to be completed among us. Continue reading

Posted in Neo-Calvinism, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments

Faith Lessons by Ray Vander Laan: When the Rabbi Says “Come”

Scythopolis is filled with arena, theater, and gymnasia (universities), but Jesus chose no disciples here. But nearby is Bethsaida, a fishing village in Galilee, a town of 600 or so, with just 8 or 10 families. Hardly the place to find disciples to change the world.

Families lived in insulae, similar to apartments.  Peter, Andrew, James, John, and Philip all came from this village.

For some reason, the practice of making “disciples” originated in Galilee. In God’s providence, he’d prepared this area for young men to be ready to follow a rabbi.

Korazin is 3 miles was of Bethsaida, and a city of 2,000 or so. Another, simple village. Vander Laan takes his group there to show them the ruins of a First Century synagogue.

Building blocks of discipleship

Community

Extended families, as many as 100, lived together in an insula, small apartments build wall to wall, surrounding a courtyard. Therefore, people saw community as more important than individualism. And rabbis and disciples lived as a community.

Scripture

Korazin preserved the ruins of a synagogue. The “Moses seat” is a chair from which the Torah was read. The scrolls of the Torah and the rest of the Tanakh (Old Testament) were kept in the “ark.” When the scroll of the Torah was opened, it was displayed, text outward, to those in attendance, who would touch the words and press their fingers to their lips: “May the word of the Lord taste sweet!” The synagogue was all about the word of God.

Talmidim

Every synagogue has a school. Boys and girls attended through age 12 or 13, and most children would have memorized much of the Torah. Most children were finished with school at this age.

Girls became wives and homemakers. Boys would go to learn their family’s trade. But a few attended the beth midrash, a high school to learn under the rabbi to master a deeper meaning of the Torah and to begin to memorize much of the rest of the Tanakh.

Of these, a very few became talmid or, in plural, talmidim: disciples. Jesus had as many as 500, and of these, he sent out 70. But 12 were especially close, and these were most truly disciples in the sense of “talmid.” The talmidim wanted not just to learn from the rabbi but to be just like him.

(The Greek word for “disciple” mathetes is broader, and includes not only what the Jews would call talmidim but mere students who’d not yet committed to the rabbi. This explains the apparently inconsistent use of the term in the Gospels.)

They therefore lived with the rabbi 24 hours a day. They studied everything about him.

Christians tend to use “disciple” as something less. But the Biblical sense is that we are consumed with being just like our rabbi Jesus. It must be our driving passion. It’s not just learning his teachings or obeying his commands. It must be a burning passion.

Selection of talmidim

A rabbi was very selective in choosing talmidim. He insisted that they know the text, have the ability, and “follow me,” meaning “be like me.” He would expect his talmidim to memorize the entire Old Testament. It was an unbelievable level of commitment.

But after a few years of walking with the rabbi, some graduated to make their own disciples.

Notice that normally someone asked, “May I follow you?” But Jesus said, “Come follow me!” Jesus was a different kind of rabbi.

When Jesus asked Peter, Andrew, James, John, and Philip to follow him, they were working in the family business. They hadn’t made it into beth midrash. But even so, Jesus chose them!

As a result, these young men knew that they could do it.  Most disciples of most rabbis didn’t make it, but this rabbi chose them. Jesus said, “Remember, you did not choose me. I chose you!”

Now, it’s obvious from reading the New Testament that the apostles struggled to be like Jesus. But they were with him all the time. They traveled with him and slept under the stars with him. Jesus took these young men all over Judea and even to Phoenecia. They asked him questions and he (often) answered.

And over time, through hearing his words (which they would have memorized), and being with him continually, they became like him.

Questions:

How will we know Jesus well enough if we’re not immersed in the text?

A student is not above his teacher. It is enough for a student to be like his teacher.

How badly do we want to be like Jesus?

Additional questions:

How do we use “disciple” in church today?

[Some speak of a “discipling” church which is nearly cultlike. The “disciples” are told what to do in everything.]

[Some speak of a true disciple as a Christian committed to certain personal, private spiritual disciplines.]

[Some speak of a true disciple as someone who obeys God’s moral commands.]

[Some speak of a true disciple as a great student of theology.]

[Some speak of a disciple as being someone who is regular in church attendance and has the right doctrinal positions.]

What does it mean to be a true disciple in the New Testament sense?

This was an age when family was everything. Most people were born, grew up, lived, and died in the same insula with grandparents and grandchildren and all in between. Some never traveled more than a mile or two, other than to Jerusalem.

Imagine what it was like to leave family for years to walk with the rabbi.

They gave up vocational training. They gave up being with the girl chosen for their marriage. They gave up everything to be with the rabbi.

What sacrifices does Jesus ask of us today?

How does our image of discipleship differ from what Jesus expected?

Is it fair to compare contemporary discipleship with what Jesus’ followers went through? Aren’t things radically different now?

How would we know a disciple today if we saw one?

How does contemporary culture undermine the First Century idea of discipleship?

[We are all about the individual, not family. And we are all about individual autonomy, not the community. A modern American would consider “hero worship” or wanting to be just like someone else to be childlike — something to grow out of. We want to “find ourselves” rather than imitating someone we admire.]

How would our view of church change if we elevated community about the individual?

Can you imagine becoming a disciple of a human rabbi? What would be a comparable arrangement today?

How do we become disciples of Jesus in this sense?

Posted in Faith Lessons by Ray Vander Laan, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

Neo-Calvinism: Conclusions, Part 1

There’s a lot of material on the Internet about neo-Calvinism, much of it quite good. And we could go on for months talking about it. But it’s time to come to some conclusions.

You don’t have to be a Calvinist to agree with most of neo-Calvinism.

That’s me. In fact, it seems to me that neo-Calvinism fits more comfortably in a non-Calvinistic theology. You see, Calvinism presents a God who predestines most of the world to damnation, and neo-Calvinism presents a God who provides a good Creation and common grace to all people because he loves them and wants what’s best for them. I have trouble reconciling those two Gods.

Narrative theology is essential to a proper understanding of the Bible.

We covered the basics of narrative theology back in the Blue Parakeet series. Let me explain it a bit differently here. Those of us who grew up in the Churches of Christ were taught a dispensational theory of the Bible. God dealt with mankind in different ways, by different rules, at different times. Therefore, we were taught, the Old Testament has been repealed and we are “New Testament Christians.”

The Old Testament, therefore, has great stories that are good for children’s stories, and has valuable prophecies of the Messiah, but is otherwise a dead letter. We even have preachers who argue over whether the ministry of Jesus was part of the Mosaic or Christian dispensation and so whether the Gospels should be treated much the same as the works of Old Testament prophets.

However, while there certainly are differences between the times, this approach has hidden much more important commonalities — themes that run throughout the Bible, from Genesis to Revelation, leaving us woefully ignorant of the Old Testament and therefore clueless about much of the New Testament. Continue reading

Posted in Neo-Calvinism, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Scam Alert

This morning, I received this email —

How are you doing,I hope all is well with you and family. I’m sorry for not informing you earlier about my trip to England for a Seminar,unfortunately, i misplaced my wallet on my way back to the Airport. I had no option but to send you an e-mail because i have no money to call and my phone does not work here.

I need a favor from you because i’m completely stranded and i need you to assist me with a soft loan of $1,450 to sort myself out of this mess and help myself return back home. Fortunately,there are western union and moneygram outlets here in the Airport.

I will appreciate whatever you can help me with and i promise to refund the money back to you as soon as i return. Kindly help me send the money through the closest  moneygram  or western union outlet  to you using my complete details below:

Name :[FRIEND]
Address: 7 Wardour Street London W1F 8ZD
City:London
Country:UK

Please help me to make the transfer as soon it’s convenient for you and once you have it sent, send me the money transfer control number with details used in sending it.

God bless you

/s/[FRIEND]

I checked the email address, and it was my friend’s actual email address. We’d corresponded only a few days ago, so I was sure it was current. The punctuation is bad, but it’s not Nigerian scam bad — and my friend is not the greatest punctuater (and who would be after having his billfold stolen?).

But it just didn’t seem right. The cc: line in the email showed my friend’s own address and not mine, meaning this had been blind copied to other people, who might double up the payment. If he was in an airport, why the need for money? He surely already had his return ticket bought! And why no phone number?

And so I checked with a relative of his in town and learn that, indeed, it’s a scam. Someone had hacked into his Hotmail email account.

Therefore, if you receive a similar email, make a few phone calls. Don’t let the scammers get you. They’re not all bad spellers from Nigeria.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 7 Comments

Sex, Marriage and Miss California: Modesty, Part 2

meatcutsWell, I had thought I’d finished this series, when this strange coincidence happened. You see, Tim Archer posted an article about how to dress for church called “How should we then dress?” On the same day, Mike Adams posted a column on the same question, called “Sunday’s Breast.” Adams writes,

But last Sunday at church I was slightly embarrassed in front of my guests. The source of my embarrassment was all of the women who came to the service dressed like they had been out at a bar. A lot of these women know that they can meet higher quality men at church than at a bar. But some don’t have enough sense to change clothes after making the transition from a bar to a church sanctuary.

One of the worst offenders was seated one row in front of us. She wasn’t like all of the other women who were content merely to show their breasts. She had to wear a dress that was thin enough to let the whole congregation know she wears thong underwear. It was even more disturbing than the 13-year olds who wear torn Daisy Dukes instead of wearing a bra.

When women come to church dressed like this they seldom stop to think that a recovering sex addict might be in the congregation. And they seldom stop to think that there are married men in the congregation who are struggling with lust issues. The church should be a place where men can come to seek help as they battle these temptations. It’s a shame that some of the temptations are following them into the church and pulling up a chair right beside them.

You’ll be surprised to learn that I disagree with Adams. To explain why, I need to tell a story. Continue reading

Posted in Sex, the Church & Miss California, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 14 Comments