College Football Season Begins — At Long Last

There is nothing more fun that college football in the Southeastern Conference. Don’t disagree unless you’ve tried it. It’s not a hobby around here. It’s a way of life. And I’m so glad that the college football season has FINALLY returned.

No insult intended, but San Jose State never had a chance against Alabama yesterday. Our scout team is better, being loaded with 4-star and 5-star recruits. The depth of the UA football team is truly astonishing. They gained 591 yards of offense with Heisman winner Mark Ingram out with an injury, and held San Jose to 175 yards of offense with a future first rounder, Marcel Dareus, suspended.

So it wasn’t much of a game yesterday, but still it was a fun exhibition of football talent, including Julio Jones’ amazing catch (about the 0:30 and 1:50 marks on the video).

(And what’s up with Ole Miss? How do you lose to Jax State?)

Posted in Uncategorized | 12 Comments

Ephesians: Introduction; 1:1 – 10, Part 2

Ruins of Celsus Library in Ephesus

(Eph 1:3-6 ESV) 3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places,  4 even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him. In love  5 he predestined us for adoption as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will,  6 to the praise of his glorious grace, with which he has blessed us in the Beloved.

“Predestined”

The idea of predestination is, of course, also just a hair controversial, being one of the major dividing lines between Protestants. And, again, we must read the text as a pastoral letter from a missionary, dealing with First Century issues, not a systematic theology pro or con Calvin or Jacob Arminius. Why did Paul talk about predestination? Continue reading

Posted in Ephesians, Uncategorized | 6 Comments

Ephesians: Introduction; 1:1 – 6, Part 1

Ruins of Celsus Library in EphesusMy church’s adult Bible classes are all studying Ephesians for the fall quarter. The church staff has provided me with copious notes and even a poster for each lesson. I’ll be writing my own stuff. I won’t entirely ignore the posters and the other material. I just prefer figuring this stuff for myself. I learn it better that way.

Is Ephesians written to the Ephesians?

The answer is almost certainly no. Every indication is that Ephesians was a circular letter, written to several churches, carried from one to the next. After all, unlike Paul’s other epistles, there are no personal greetings in the letter — although he’d spent as much time there as anywhere. Compare that to the chapter of personal greetings at the end of Romans, even though he’d never made it to Rome!

And the most ancient manuscripts of the letter omit “in Ephesus,” including the Chester Beatty papyrus of about AD 200 and the fourth century codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus. That’s very impressive authority to reject “in Ephesus” as not part of the original. But the association of the letter with Ephesus is quite ancient. It seems likely to me that Ephesus was among the original recipients, so that there was indeed a version sent to the Ephesians, whereas the same letter was sent to other congregations as well. Continue reading

Posted in Ephesians, Uncategorized | 8 Comments

Colossians: The Instrumental Music Question, Part 2

Colossae mound

The text

Now, I guess it’s time for Colossians —

(Col 3:12-16 ESV) 12 Put on then, as God’s chosen ones, holy and beloved, compassionate hearts, kindness, humility, meekness, and patience,  13 bearing with one another and, if one has a complaint against another, forgiving each other; as the Lord has forgiven you, so you also must forgive.  14 And above all these put on love, which binds everything together in perfect harmony.  15 And let the peace of Christ rule in your hearts, to which indeed you were called in one body. And be thankful.  16 Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly, teaching and admonishing one another in all wisdom, singing psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, with thankfulness in your hearts to God.

This passage doesn’t read at all like a rulebook on how to conduct the assembly. In fact, there’s no express mention of the assembly, and the context is about how to live as Christians. It’s about relationship.

V. 16 has but one command: “Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly.” Commentators dispute over the meaning of the phrase, but it seems clearly a reference back to —

(Col 1:5b-7a ESV) Of this you have heard before in the word of the truth, the gospel,  6 which has come to you, as indeed in the whole world it is bearing fruit and growing–as it also does among you, since the day you heard it and understood the grace of God in truth,  7 just as you learned it from Epaphras our beloved fellow servant.

(Col 1:24-26 ESV)  24 Now I rejoice in my sufferings for your sake, and in my flesh I am filling up what is lacking in Christ’s afflictions for the sake of his body, that is, the church,  25 of which I became a minister according to the stewardship from God that was given to me for you, to make the word of God fully known,  26 the mystery hidden for ages and generations but now revealed to his saints.

In both cases, “word” refers to the gospel. Paul’s command in 3:16 is to let the gospel dwell in your richly. This command has three participles attached to it: teaching, admonishing, and singing. These are, of course, characteristic of the typical Christian assembly, but they are hardly specific to the assembly. I’m sure that the early church engaged in all three (not five!) at times other than the assembly. It would seem fairer to say, with Paul, I am convinced, that these are to characterize the church — not just during the time of assembly. Indeed, as admonishment often includes correction and rebuke, it’s often inappropriate for the assembly and is best done in private.

“Singing” is ado, a Greek word for “sing.” It’s often used in the context of instrumental music, as in Isa 23:16 and Rev 5:8-9, but it doesn’t mean “sing with an instrument.” It just means “sing.” In fairness, there’s very little here about singing with or without an instrument. In fact, the closest we get to explicit instructions is the reference to “psalms,” which often urge the use of instruments, many of which were written to be sung to an instrument and even include instrumental instructions. I mean, what do we do with psalms such as —

(Psa 76:1 ESV) ESV  Psalm 76:1 To the choirmaster: with stringed instruments. A Psalm of Asaph. A Song. In Judah God is known; his name is great in Israel.

(Psa 150:1 ESV) ESV  Psalm 150:1 Praise the LORD! Praise God in his sanctuary; praise him in his mighty heavens!  2 Praise him for his mighty deeds; praise him according to his excellent greatness!  3 Praise him with trumpet sound; praise him with lute and harp!  4 Praise him with tambourine and dance; praise him with strings and pipe!  5 Praise him with sounding cymbals; praise him with loud clashing cymbals!  6 Let everything that has breath praise the LORD! Praise the LORD!

Now, I’m not inclined to argue that Paul intends to command the use of instruments, because it would no more fit the context than a command not to use instruments. But taken out of context, a command to sing the Psalms sure seems to approve of instruments!

But the context argues to the contrary. Paul began in chapter 1 laying out the important elements of Christianity: the sacrifice of Jesus, the gospel, the kingdom, our mission with God. He says not a word about the assembly or “acts of worship.”

In chapter 2, Paul condemns the false teaching in Colosse. He says,

(Col 2:8 ESV)  8 See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ.

We must avoid “human tradition,” even though some of the traditions he condemns have roots in the scriptures. There is no safety in inventing rules, and when a rule is uncertain to us, it’s no safer to insist on it than not to insist on it, because it’s sin to violate God’s rules but also sin to impose a rule that God does not. There is no bias in favor of doubtful rules.

(Col 2:20-22 ESV) 20 If with Christ you died to the elemental spirits of the world, why, as if you were still alive in the world, do you submit to regulations–  21 “Do not handle, Do not taste, Do not touch”  22 (referring to things that all perish as they are used)–according to human precepts and teachings?

(Col 3:2 ESV)  2 Set your minds on things that are above, not on things that are on earth.

What’s wrong with commands against handling, tasting, and touching? According to Paul, these commands are about things that cannot be inherently evil because they “perish with using.” They have no eternal significance. The things that matter — that define God’s people — are things of eternal significance —

(Col 3:11-15 ESV)  11 Here there is not Greek and Jew, circumcised and uncircumcised, barbarian, Scythian, slave, free; but Christ is all, and in all.  12 Put on then, as God’s chosen ones, holy and beloved, compassionate hearts, kindness, humility, meekness, and patience,  13 bearing with one another and, if one has a complaint against another, forgiving each other; as the Lord has forgiven you, so you also must forgive.  14 And above all these put on love, which binds everything together in perfect harmony.  15 And let the peace of Christ rule in your hearts, to which indeed you were called in one body. And be thankful.

Unity across ethnic lines, loving, compassionate hearts, tolerance, forgiveness, peace, and gratitude don’t wear out and last forever. They matter.

It’s hard to imagine that Paul would consider the choice of a cappella vs. instrumental music to be about “things that are above” or things that don’t “perish with using.” Harps do indeed wear out.

Now, to be clear, while harps wear out, and so aren’t of eternal significance, they can be used for purposes that are sinful —

(Col 3:5 ESV)  5 Put to death therefore what is earthly in you: sexual immorality, impurity, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry.

If a harp were to be used in a house of prostitution, it would be used for a wicked purpose. It’s just that it’s not inherently wicked. Use it for a holy purpose, and it won’t be sinful.

Now, be fair to Paul and the Spirit. Does this passage read like it was written to grant authority for acts of worship in the assembly? Is this how someone would write authorization?

And where is the emphasis? Not on the participles but on the command: “Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly.” For this to happen, we need to teach and admonish each other! And we need to sing words of instruction and encouragement, such as the Psalms! You see, the participles are telling us how to let the word richly dwell — not how to conduct the assembly. That is simply not the subject under consideration. Rather, we must encourage each other to bring the gospel alive in our hearts and action, so that we can flee seeking salvation through rules and “thou shalt nots” and instead focus on eternal things: love, unity, and mission. That’s what Paul was talking about.

Posted in Colossians, Uncategorized | 21 Comments

Colossians: The Instrumental Music Question, Part 1

Colossae moundWe’ve covered instrumental music countless times on this blog, and long-time readers may well be tired of the question. But Col 3:16 is next up for the class I’m teaching, and  this will be a lesson taught in just for one week — if possible. So I have to address the question succinctly.

Let’s see. There are really only about three arguments against the instrument:

1. The meaning of psallo

2. The evidence of early, uninspired Christians

3. The lack of biblical authority Continue reading

Posted in Colossians, Uncategorized | 39 Comments

Recommendation for a Church in Pittsburgh?

Pittsburgh, PA : Pitts landscape Mt. Washington view

Do you know of any good churches in the Pittsburgh area? I would definitely be interested in progressive Churches of Christ, though not exclusively.

My wife and I just moved here a few weeks ago, and we’re searching for a group that not only studies and emphasizes scripture, but acts like Christ in the process. (That’s a poor summary of what it is we’re seeking, but hopefully you get the idea.)

I grew up in the NICOC, and now my insurrectionist brothers and I read your blog regularly — and consternate our parents and in-laws with our radicalism. So…thanks!

I’m not familiar with the area, but hopefully the readers can make some suggestions.

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

The Age of Accountability: Conditional Immortality: The Nature of Damnation

8/8/2010We now have to consider a more biblical understanding of damnation. It damnation isn’t eternal torture, just how bad can it be? Should we still be motivated to seek and save the lost? If the damned will simply be destroyed, why bother?

And what if someone is innocent — like a baby — but not saved. Or nearly innocent, such as someone newly accountable. What will be the fate of such a one?

Separation from God

This question returns us to — Continue reading

Posted in Age of Accountability, Uncategorized | 8 Comments

Age of Accountability: Conditional Immortality: In Response to Objections in the Comments

8/8/2010I suspect I’m pushing the limits of the readers’ patience by continuing to discuss conditional immortality without getting back to the age of accountability question, and so I’ll try to answer the objections recently made in the comments very simply.

In response to an earlier question, I listed several reasons why I consider conditional immortality important enough to take up space here. The reasons I think it’s true are found, of course, in the posts themselves, as well as several earlier posts indexed as the “Surprised by Hell” series.

A reader responded,

Even if you’re right, what other people will and won’t accept as fair should never motivate us to change our views.

Another wrote,

Today’s modern ear cannot hold in tension the great love of God with the wrath of God—so we need to make a small tweak in our eschatology in order to get people to listen and to hear.

And if I was telling people why to change their views, that would make sense. The only reason a reader should change his views is if he’s persuaded that I’ve more correctly interpreted the scriptures than those who disagree.

I really can’t bear the thought that anyone thinks I take this position because I think it’ll improve the marketing of the gospel. (I’m nauseous at the thought.)  I’m sure many people strongly disagree with me, and that’s fine. But please don’t impugn my motives. It’s not right. Continue reading

Posted in Age of Accountability, Uncategorized | 9 Comments

The Age of Accountability: Conditional Immortality: Other Counter Arguments, Part 2

8/8/2010Revelation 6

(Rev 6:9-11 ESV) 9 When he opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain for the word of God and for the witness they had borne.  10 They cried out with a loud voice, “O Sovereign Lord, holy and true, how long before you will judge and avenge our blood on those who dwell on the earth?”  11 Then they were each given a white robe and told to rest a little longer, until the number of their fellow servants and their brothers should be complete, who were to be killed as they themselves had been.

This passage suggests the martyrs’ “souls” dwell in heaven awaiting the resurrection. I do not take this to refer to actual souls pleading for actual vengeance. Here are some of the reasons – Continue reading

Posted in Age of Accountability, Uncategorized | 9 Comments

The Age of Accountability: Conditional Immortality: Other Counter Arguments, Part 1

8/8/2010Anonymous and Alexander have weighed in with a series of verses to argue against the position I’ve argued for here.

I’ve spent more time on the conditional immortality argument than I meant to, but I’m not surprised — and I will be getting to the age of accountability issue. But I’ve enjoyed the exchange because since I first covered this position, I’ve learned a lot. My understanding of the topic is now much deeper than when I began — and much of that is due to comments from the readers.

Background material

Edward Fudge maintains a web page with extensive material in support of the conditional immortality viewpoint. He also includes a list of famous biblical scholars who agree with that viewpoint. I would add Patrick Mead and Al Maxey to the list.

Now, before someone fires off a comment about following the Bible rather than men (as though anyone here thinks otherwise), I should say that I reached my conclusion from Bible study — seeking to disprove Fudge. I made most of the same arguments I’m responding to here, and I learned that Fudge’s position fits the scriptures far better than the traditional view.

Now, nothing I teach rejects the reality of an actual hell. I don’t accept the view of N. T. Wright that hell is purely separation from God. It is separation from God, but it’s also an agonizing death. It’s the natural result of God’s purification of the heavens and the earth, which will be by fire. It will just be finite. Continue reading

Posted in Age of Accountability, Uncategorized | 14 Comments