Pacifism: The Sermon on the Mount, Part 4 (“But I say unto you …”)

pacifismAfter declaring that he does not intend to abolish the Law and the Prophets, Jesus begins to show the deeper meanings of the commands given by God through the Law and the Prophets.

(Mat 5:21-26)  “You have heard that it was said to the people long ago, ‘Do not murder, and anyone who murders will be subject to judgment.’ 22 But I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother will be subject to judgment. Again, anyone who says to his brother, ‘Raca, ‘ is answerable to the Sanhedrin. But anyone who says, ‘You fool!’ will be in danger of the fire of hell.

23 “Therefore, if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you, 24 leave your gift there in front of the altar. First go and be reconciled to your brother; then come and offer your gift.

25 “Settle matters quickly with your adversary who is taking you to court. Do it while you are still with him on the way, or he may hand you over to the judge, and the judge may hand you over to the officer, and you may be thrown into prison. 26 I tell you the truth, you will not get out until you have paid the last penny.

If the Curse corrupted our relationships with each other, how will we overcome that in this dawning Kingdom? Well, it will take a lot more than not committing murder! We need to be reconciled to each other — and this is more important than formal worship of God. Indeed, it is worship of a higher kind, because it brings us closer to Eden, where God walks among us. Read more »

Pacifism: Swords Into Plowshares

Twice the Old Testament prophets announce that a day will come when men beat their swords into plowshares –

(Isa 2:1-4)  This is what Isaiah son of Amoz saw concerning Judah and Jerusalem: 2 In the last days the mountain of the Lord’s temple will be established as chief among the mountains; it will be raised above the hills, and all nations will stream to it. 3 Many peoples will come and say, “Come, let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob. He will teach us his ways, so that we may walk in his paths.” The law will go out from Zion, the word of the LORD from Jerusalem. 4 He will judge between the nations and will settle disputes for many peoples. They will beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks. Nation will not take up sword against nation, nor will they train for war anymore.

(Micah 4:1-7)  In the last days the mountain of the Lord’s temple will be established as chief among the mountains; it will be raised above the hills, and peoples will stream to it. 2 Many nations will come and say, “Come, let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob. He will teach us his ways, so that we may walk in his paths.”

The law will go out from Zion, the word of the LORD from Jerusalem. 3 He will judge between many peoples and will settle disputes for strong nations far and wide. They will beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks. Nation will not take up sword against nation, nor will they train for war anymore. 4 Every man will sit under his own vine and under his own fig tree, and no one will make them afraid, for the LORD Almighty has spoken. 5 All the nations may walk in the name of their gods; we will walk in the name of the LORD our God for ever and ever. 6 “In that day,” declares the LORD, “I will gather the lame; I will assemble the exiles and those I have brought to grief. 7 I will make the lame a remnant, those driven away a strong nation. The LORD will rule over them in Mount Zion from that day and forever.

Consider Isa 2. This will happen “in the last days.” And it’s not just God’s people who will do this: “Nation will not take up sword against nation.” Read more »

Pacifism: The Sermon on the Mount, Part 3 (fitting the Sermon into the Story)

pacifismBefore we try to interpret the next part of the Sermon, we need to fit the Sermon into the larger story of the Bible (“story” does not mean fiction).

God placed Adam and Eve in the Garden, a special place without death or suffering. And yet they sinned, leading to the Curse on all Creation in Genesis 3 and to their being expelled from the Garden.

One aspect of the Curse was the beginning of strife in marriage (Gen 3:16). Of course, the strife between husband and wife proved also to be strife among all people. Not only was our relationship with God corrupted (leading to the Flood and Babel), so were our relationships with each other.

God set about to make things right once again. Indeed, God began his work to make things even better at the End. Read more »

Pacifism: The Sermon on the Mount, Part 2 (Blessed are those who are persecuted)

pacifismEven though Jesus announces the coming Kingdom in terms of prophecy, he adds an astonishing twist –

(Mat 5:10-12)  “Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

11 “Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. 12 Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.”

Prophecy, to Jesus, was not merely God’s way of proving that he knows the future. Rather, prophecy is one way in which God reveals his will for and makes promises to his people. Jesus wasn’t saying: be assured that God really is omniscient! The First Century Jews considered that entirely obvious.

No, Jesus’ point was that: God is finally keeping his promises. You see, the prophecies were covenantal, not apologetic. That is, they were promises to be kept, not proof of God’s foreknowledge. (Of course, they do prove God’s foreknowledge. That’s just not the main purpose they serve.)

And if God was about to keep his promises, the people would naturally expect life to suddenly get very easy. Read more »

Pacifism: Jeremiah on What Is Just and Right

pacifismJeremiah was a prophet of God who wrote from Judea shortly before God allowed Nebuchadnezzar to destroy Jerusalem and the temple and take the Judeans into Babylonian captivity. The book contains many warnings and contains some powerful prophecies of the Messiah and the age he was to inaugerate.

(Jer 7:5-7)  If you really change your ways and your actions and deal with each other justly, 6 if you do not oppress the alien, the fatherless or the widow and do not shed innocent blood in this place, and if you do not follow other gods to your own harm, 7 then I will let you live in this place, in the land I gave your forefathers for ever and ever.

Before Nebuchadnezzar destroyed Jerusalem, Jeremiah promises that the Israelites may live there “for ever and ever” if they would treat each other with justice (translated “righteousness” in the New Testament) and do not shed innocent blood. The verse sure seems to say that the guilty may be killed in appropriate cases “for ever and ever,” that is, until the end of time when God himself will destroy the guilty.

(Jer 22:3)  This is what the LORD says: Do what is just and right. Rescue from the hand of his oppressor the one who has been robbed. Do no wrong or violence to the alien, the fatherless or the widow, and do not shed innocent blood in this place.

God’s command is that we rescue victims from oppressors. This means there may be no shedding of innocent blood but not that there may be no shedding of guilty blood. Indeed, “Do no … violence” to the weak certainly suggests that violence should be done to those who oppress the weak. Read more »

Pacifism: The Sermon on the Mount, Part 1 (Blessed are the poor in spirit)

pacifismAt last I get to the central prooftext of many pacifistic arguments.

The Sermon on the Mount is notoriously difficult to interpret, for many reasons. One reason, of course, is Jesus’ pithiness. He uses so few words to make a point that we sometimes struggle to understand. Another problem is our unfamiliarity with the cultural background. We 21st Century Westerners struggle to hear the Sermon as Jesus’ original listeners would have heard it. And we so often want to read this sermon as legislation — as though Jesus came to issue new laws superseding the Law of Moses — which is exactly what he says he’s not doing (Mat 5:17).

And so, before we jump into the verses that come up in the pacifism debate, we need to take a few steps back so we can get a running start.

(Mat 5:3)  “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.”

The usual Sunday school class interpretation of this verse is: “God wants us to be poor in spirit. Class, what does that mean? How can we be poor in spirit?” That’s not Jesus’ point at all. Read more »

Pacifism: Suffering

[I need to bring this series to a close. To hasten the process, I'll be posting two posts a day for a while.]

pacifismIn a series of posts, Tim Archer has pointed out the many passages that teach Christians are called to follow Jesus in his suffering and even to the point of death. And it’s true. Does that fact argue for pacifism?

(I’m not suggesting that this is Tim’s argument. He is still writing his series.)

Let me just run through a sampling of scriptures dealing with suffering.

(John 15:20-21)  Remember the words I spoke to you: ‘No servant is greater than his master.’ If they persecuted me, they will persecute you also. If they obeyed my teaching, they will obey yours also. 21 They will treat you this way because of my name, for they do not know the One who sent me.

(Acts 5:41)  The apostles left the Sanhedrin, rejoicing because they had been counted worthy of suffering disgrace for the Name.

(Acts 9:16)  I will show him how much he must suffer for my name.”

(Phil 1:27-30)  Whatever happens, conduct yourselves in a manner worthy of the gospel of Christ. Then, whether I come and see you or only hear about you in my absence, I will know that you stand firm in one spirit, contending as one man for the faith of the gospel 28 without being frightened in any way by those who oppose you. This is a sign to them that they will be destroyed, but that you will be saved–and that by God. 29 For it has been granted to you on behalf of Christ not only to believe on him, but also to suffer for him, 30 since you are going through the same struggle you saw I had, and now hear that I still have.

(1 Th 2:2)  We had previously suffered and been insulted in Philippi, as you know, but with the help of our God we dared to tell you his gospel in spite of strong opposition.

(2 Th 1:5)  All this is evidence that God’s judgment is right, and as a result you will be counted worthy of the kingdom of God, for which you are suffering.

(2 Tim 1:8)  So do not be ashamed to testify about our Lord, or ashamed of me his prisoner. But join with me in suffering for the gospel, by the power of God,

(2 Tim 1:11-12)  And of this gospel I was appointed a herald and an apostle and a teacher. 12 That is why I am suffering as I am. Yet I am not ashamed, because I know whom I have believed, and am convinced that he is able to guard what I have entrusted to him for that day.

(2 Tim 2:8-9)  Remember Jesus Christ, raised from the dead, descended from David. This is my gospel, 9 for which I am suffering even to the point of being chained like a criminal. But God’s word is not chained.

(Heb 10:32-34)  Remember those earlier days after you had received the light, when you stood your ground in a great contest in the face of suffering. 33 Sometimes you were publicly exposed to insult and persecution; at other times you stood side by side with those who were so treated. 34 You sympathized with those in prison and joyfully accepted the confiscation of your property, because you knew that you yourselves had better and lasting possessions.

(Heb 12:2-14)  Let us fix our eyes on Jesus, the author and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy set before him endured the cross, scorning its shame, and sat down at the right hand of the throne of God. 3 Consider him who endured such opposition from sinful men, so that you will not grow weary and lose heart. 4 In your struggle against sin, you have not yet resisted to the point of shedding your blood.

(James 5:10)  Brothers, as an example of patience in the face of suffering, take the prophets who spoke in the name of the Lord.

(1 Pet 3:13-17)  Who is going to harm you if you are eager to do good? 14 But even if you should suffer for what is right, you are blessed. “Do not fear what they fear; do not be frightened.” 15 But in your hearts set apart Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect, 16 keeping a clear conscience, so that those who speak maliciously against your good behavior in Christ may be ashamed of their slander. 17 It is better, if it is God’s will, to suffer for doing good than for doing evil.

(1 Pet 4:16)  However, if you suffer as a Christian, do not be ashamed, but praise God that you bear that name.

I would like to suggest a theory. Each of these passages speaks to suffering because of being a Christian. They aren’t speaking of yielding to a bandit, a rapist, or a murderer. The suffering is all about persecution on account of our place in the Kingdom. And I think the suffering we are called to is suffering on account of our faith.

Consider Jesus. He suffering on the cross, but it was because of his claim to be the Messiah. Our suffering is like Jesus’ suffering when it is also due to Jesus’  claim that he is the Messiah. Otherwise, our suffering is the same suffering that all mankind is subject to. Our faith — and God through his Spirit and providential care — give us a comfort in this ordinary form of suffering that non-Christians do not participate in.

Thus, Christians are strengthened in suffering as others aren’t, but Christians often suffer as others do not have to.

Now, some will argue that suffering due to our pacifism is suffering for our faith. But the logic begs the question: If we assume that pacifism is commanded, then the suffering passages command pacifism.

Rather, I think the underlying principle is found precisely where the passages point us — in the submission of Jesus to crucifixion. He willingly suffered an agonizing death, but not because of a principled non-violence. He submitted to crucifixion as an act of love for us, so that we might be included in the promises God gave Abraham and so God would give us his Spirit (Gal 3:14). To suffer as Jesus suffered is to suffer as an act of love for others — a principled, gospel-encircled, biblically informed love.

Now, if a gunman enters my house and threatens to kill me and my family, I have to choose between two possible acts of love. I can offer no resistance, and so rescue the gunman from the consequences of his crime, or I can fight to save my family, rescuing them from the gunman’s evil. Which is the higher love?

Some would argue that the less-natural non-resistance to the gunman is higher because it’s harder and goes against all natural instincts. I don’t see it. Non-resistance only enables sin and perhaps allows the man to commit further crimes against other innocents. This is not love.

Rather, love is protecing the innocent from evil. (Using lethal force when non-lethal force would work, is not love either.)

The next post on Jeremiah will explain.

It’s Friday! Halloween Candy Cursed! (And Why Alabama’s Victory Over LSU Is Certain)

OK… I’m a little late on this one… but did you know that Halloween candy is secretly cursed before it’s sent to your local grocery store?  And we know this is true because it was found on a blog put out by the Christian Broadcasting Network!  (Well, at least it was at one time… it’s now been taken down; but you can get the cached page here).

That’s what BibleBeltBlogger found out in this story. Here’s an excerpt:

You may ask, “Doesn’t God have more power than the devil?” Yes, but He has given that power to us. If we do not walk in it, we will become the devil’s prey. Witchcraft works through dirty hearts and wrong spirits.

During this period demons are assigned against those who participate in the rituals and festivities. These demons are automatically drawn to the fetishes that open doors for them to come into the lives of human beings. For example, most of the candy sold during this season has been dedicated and prayed over by witches.

Even the colors of Halloween (orange, brown and dark red) are dedicated. These colors are connected to the fall equinox, which is around the 20th or 21st of September each year and is sometimes called “Mabon.” During this season witches are celebrating the changing of the seasons from summer to fall. They give praise to the gods for the demonic harvest. They pray to the gods of the elements (air, fire, water and earth).

(Thanks to Todd Rhodes at MMI Weblog. Emphasis added.)

Okay. First, of all this, this report is from the Christian Broadcasting Network, so it has to be true. Christians wouldn’t lie!

So now you know why we have Fall Festivals instead of Halloween Carnivals and why our kids must dress up as ladybugs and lambs rather that witches and ghosts. But, you know, I didn’t know that the witches worked through the power of orange, brown, and dark red. Really? It makes SO much sense now!

I mean, I’d always suspected the candy of being cursed. Just look at my wasteline! You see, it’s not my fault!! It’s those *&%^*^* witches. Yes, it is!

And this explains my feelings toward Tennessee Volunteers football team (color: orange, very much a Halloween color) and Auburn (blue and orange: classic Halloween coloration).

CRIMSON is light red and not to be confused with dark red.

I always knew God was on Alabama’s side, but now I know why!

And take Southern Cal (please!) — now those uniforms are clearly witch-cursed. How else to explain that loss to Washington? And the hiring of Kiffin and Chizik by Tennessee and Auburn? Surely these are the deeds of a coven of witches. What rational explanation could there be?

It all finally makes sense!

So how do I get the witches to curse LSU? Purple and gold. Hmmm …. GOLD! It’s another witch-cursed fall color. The witch-free, God-favored Crimson Tide is sure to beat the bewitched Bengal Tigers of LSU! I’m so excited.

(And I have to tell the children’s minister about banning fall colors in next year’s HalloweenFall Festival. She’ll be thrilled I’m sure.)

(I sure hope our players haven’t eaten any witch-cursed candy! I’d better call Coach Saban. I mean, Terence Cody could probably eat enough candy to curse the whole team!! I’m sure I’ve got Coach on speed dial somewhere …)

Pacifism: Whom Does God Defend?

pacifismThere many passages in the Old Testament where God promises to defend his people without regard to the power of the people.

(Judg 7:2)  The LORD said to Gideon, “You have too many men for me to deliver Midian into their hands. In order that Israel may not boast against me that her own strength has saved her,

(2 Ki 19:34)  I will defend this city and save it, for my sake and for the sake of David my servant.”

(Isa 31:4-5)  This is what the LORD says to me: “As a lion growls, a great lion over his prey– and though a whole band of shepherds is called together against him, he is not frightened by their shouts or disturbed by their clamor– so the LORD Almighty will come down to do battle on Mount Zion and on its heights. 5 Like birds hovering overhead, the LORD Almighty will shield Jerusalem; he will shield it and deliver it, he will ‘pass over’ it and will rescue it.”

(Zec 4:6)  So he said to me, “This is the word of the LORD to Zerubbabel: ‘Not by might nor by power, but by my Spirit,’ says the LORD Almighty.

I think these verses are true. Read more »

Pacifism: Additional Material

pacifismOver at the Berean Spirit discussion group, a part of Yahoo Groups, several good folks, including Tim Archer and Bobby Valentine, are having a great discussion on pacifism. They even mention this blog now and again. They seem disagree — which makes the posts must reading.

The posts are not open to the public. You have to ask to join the group, but they let me in, so their standards aren’t very high. :grin:

Anyway, of the forums I lurk in, Berean Spirit is usually my favorite because the level of debate can be very high indeed. And Bobby and Tim are always good reads (even when I disagree).

Pacifism: Just War and Christian Politics, Part 2

pacifismFrankly, I doubt seriously that many national leaders — even US leaders — give a lot of thought to just war theology when deciding whether to go to war. The churches don’t teach this in Sunday school or preach it from the pulpit, and so national leaders follow their instincts. And as I’ve noted earlier, our instincts are often more trained by nationalism than Christianity. Indeed, we so compartmentalize our thinking that we Christians routinely ignore our Christian values on political questions.

Part of the solution is for our pulpits and classrooms to teach our members how to think about the daily news in Christian terms. Of course, our preachers and teachers have virtually no training on this either, as our seminaries and Bible colleges are more interested in the Nestorian controversy than the Christian perspective on adoption or illegal immigration. Indeed, once we suggest that preachers should consider such things, we open the door for preachers to spout whatever their political party tells them to think — which is scary indeed — and certainly happens in too many churches already. Read more »

Faith Lessons by Ray Vander Laan: Don’t Forget Us

Can we identify with our brothers and sisters who suffer for Jesus around the world?

RVL takes the group to a church carved 20+ stories underground in Cappadocia. An airshaft is disguised as a well. The church would have sat in darkness when the enemy was present. Torches would have used up the oxygen and perhaps have given them away. They could only come out at night.

RVL reads from Heb 11,

(Heb 11:32-37)  And what more shall I say? I do not have time to tell about Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, David, Samuel and the prophets, 33 who through faith conquered kingdoms, administered justice, and gained what was promised; who shut the mouths of lions, 34 quenched the fury of the flames, and escaped the edge of the sword; whose weakness was turned to strength; and who became powerful in battle and routed foreign armies. 35 Women received back their dead, raised to life again. Others were tortured and refused to be released, so that they might gain a better resurrection. 36 Some faced jeers and flogging, while still others were chained and put in prison. 37 They were stoned ; they were sawed in two; they were put to death by the sword. They went about in sheepskins and goatskins, destitute, persecuted and mistreated–

How far would you go to be like the rabbi? How long would you stay underground? Read more »

Pacifism: Just War and Christian Politics, Part 1

pacifismI’m finding myself in the just war camp. I’m not 100% comfortable here, but it makes better sense to me than anything else I’ve heard.

The doctrine defining a just war goes back to Augustine. Augustine was a bishop at a time when the Roman Empire had adopted Christianity as its official religion. Therefore, the Caesar was a Christian, and the question quite naturally arose as to when a Christian emperor could command troops into the battlefield.

This was also a time when Northern European tribes (“barbarians”) were invading Rome. Rome had to either wage war or turn the Empire over the barbarians.

The Wikipedia summarizes his views simply –

Augustine developed a theology of just war, that is, war that is acceptable under certain conditions. First, war must occur for a good and just purpose rather than for self-gain or as an exercise of power. Second, just war must be waged by a properly instituted authority such as the state. Third, peace must be a central motive even in the midst of violence.

Since that time, many theologians have sought to refine the theory. There’s an excellent article by Arthur F. Holmes that explains the theory. Speaking of Augustine, he writes,

He tells the Roman General Boniface, who was later to defend Carthage against the Vandals, that war is not a matter of choice but of necessity, forced on us by the need to control violence in a fallen world. It is waged only to restore peace, so he should preserve the spirit of a peacemaker, limiting violence to what is needed in resisting and deterring aggression, and extend­ing mercy to the vanquished and the captive.

Holmes offer some further history of the teaching –

The sixteenth-century Spanish theologian Francisco de Vitoria develops the theory further. Examining King Phil­ip’s wars against the American Indians, he condemns their lack of just cause. War, he insists, is not justified for religious reasons (to convert the heathen) nor for economic causes (to gain their gold) nor for political reasons (to extend the empire). The Indians, however pagan, immoral and uncivilized, are human beings with rights equal to those of all other persons. The natural law protects them against violence and injustice.

Vitoria also asks whether the soldier who doubts the justice of a cause should fight. Ordinarily, one should trust the lawful government to do what is lawful. But if justice is seriously in doubt, and if careful inquiry does not allay those doubts, then the soldier should refuse to fight. Selec­tive conscientious objection is the corollary of a just war ethic.

The Protestant Reformers meantime addressed the problem in similar terms. … The use of the sword, [Luther] argues, is divinely entrusted to governments in order to repel injustice and keep the peace. It can, there­fore, be a work of love for the common good. But only defen­sive war is just, including action to recover unjustly seized property from previous conflicts. This rules out religious wars, aggression and any attempt to revenge an insult. Only the highest governmental authority has the right to initiate military action, so that rebellion is always unjustified. It was on this basis that he opposed the famous Peasants’ Revolt. Yet the ruler, if wrong, should be disobeyed: selective con­scientious disobedience is not revolt.

He builds his case from Rom 13 as well as –

(1 Pet 2:13-14)  Submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every authority instituted among men: whether to the king, as the supreme authority, 14 or to governors, who are sent by him to punish those who do wrong and to commend those who do right.

He summarizes the Old Testament record thusly –

These [New Testament] limitations are reinforced when one considers the Old Testament attitude toward war. While military conflict is regarded as a tragic fact of life, one for which God strength­ens his people and one which God uses in the execution of justice, it is nonetheless lamented as an evil from whose scourge humanity must be delivered. Israel was instructed to limit the destruction and violence involved in its conquest of Canaan (Deut. 2). David was not allowed to build God’s temple because he was a man of war (1 Chron. 22:8-9; 28:3). The psalmist grieved over violence, looking to the God who makes war cease and destroys its weaponry (Ps. 46; 120). The prophets condemned its fratricide and its atrocities (for example Amos 1‑2), mourned its destruction (Lam.), and gloried in the One who will finally bring peace and justice to earth so that none need even feel afraid (Is. 2:1-5; 9:1-7; 11:1-9).

Holmes explains the overarching goal of the theory –

Third, the just war theory does not try to justify war. Rather it tries to bring war under the control of justice so that, if consistently practiced by all parties to a dispute, it would eliminate war altogether. It insists that the only just cause for going to war is defense against aggression. If all parties adhered to this rule, then nobody would ever be an aggres­sor and no war would ever occur. The basic intention of the just war theory, then, is to condemn war and to prevent it by moral persuasion. But since people will sometimes not be so persuaded, it proceeds to limit war – its occasion, its goals, its weaponry and methods – so as to reduce the evils that have not been altogether prevented.

He offers these guiding principles as summarizing the thought of current just war theologians –

  1. Just cause. All aggression is condemned; only defensive war is legitimate.
  2. Just intention. The only legitimate intention is to secure a just peace for all involved. Neither revenge nor conquest nor economic gain nor ideological supremacy are justified.
  3. Last resort. War may only be entered upon when all negotiations and compromise have been tried and failed.
  4. Formal declaration. Since the use of military force is the prerogative of governments, not of private individuals, a state of war must be officially declared by the highest authorities.
  5. Limited objectives. If the purpose is peace, then un­conditional surrender or the destruction of a nation’s eco­nomic or political institutions is an unwarranted objective.
  6. Proportionate means. The weaponry and the force used should be limited to what is needed to repel the aggression and deter future attacks, that is to say to secure a just peace. Total or unlimited war is ruled out.
  7. Noncombatant immunity. Since war is an official act of government, only those who are officially agents of government may fight, and individuals not actively contributing to the conflict including POW’s and [c]asualties as well as civilian nonparticipants) should be immune from attack.

Now, each of these points raises a host of subsidiary questions. For example, under 3, how many people must suffer or die while the diplomats dither? Obviously, evil rulers are happy to use the diplomats to delay war while they consolidate their forces and continue their evil. And under 5, what if the nation’s political institutions are evil? Was it wrong for the Allies to oust the Nazis from control of Germany? Should they have stopped at the borders of the country? Should the US have forced a change in government in Japan?

So I’m not entirely sold on this version of the theory, but I have to agree from a broad perspective. Yes, the scriptures give the government the power to defend its people from evil, and this fact leads to a limitation on what wars are truly just.

Pacifism: Mere Discipleship, Dual Loyalties, and the Pledge of Allegiance

pacifismLee Camp, a professor at Lipscomb University, has written a marvelous book called Mere Discipleship. It has a chapter arguing for pacifism. It wouldn’t surprise me to learn that he’s the first professor at Lipscomb to agree with the founder, David Lipscomb, on this subject in over 50 years.

Beginning at page 147, Camp takes on nationalism and patriotism.

Nationalism and patriotism are self-centeredness writ large, community habit that prepare us to do “whatever is necessary,” as our politicians put it these days, to “preserve our cherished way of life.” … Employing all means at its disposal — public education, national holidays, churches, culture, media, and, yes, my child’s Christian preschool — nationalism has rooted its alleged “naturalness” deep into our souls. … We begin to believe it necessary, for our very survival, to pledge allegiance to the empire, rather than constantly holding before ourselves our exclusive allegiance to the kingdom of God.

Oh, wow …

Camp then reaches a pacifistic conclusion.

Now, I agree, but only in part. His point about patriotism and nationalism is quite true. Read more »

Pacifism: Police and Defensive War, Part 2

pacifismAnother thought experiment

Imagine a world where half the nations are almost entirely all Christians. The Christians all refuse military service, and quite consistently, they refuse to hire mercenaries. What will happen?

If the non-Christian minority serves in the military while the majority Christians refuse service, the Christians will surely incur resentment from the minority, who will have given their children’s lives for the sake of people who will not defend themselves. That seems wrong. It’s not so hard to admire a small percentage who refuse military service as a matter of conscience, but if nearly everyone refuses to defend their neighbors, Christians and Christianity will be despised.

Read more »

Overseeing the Moderate Church: Part 3

Divided churchThis brings us to teaching. Moderate churches generally have a very weak educational program, because the doctrines that divide the church are off limits. Either one side dominates the classes and the other side doesn’t listen, or else the tough topics are just never talked about in a serious way. Or else there’s one class that teaches one doctrine and another class that teaches another–but no one is ever required to question his pre-existing beliefs.

After all, serious consideration of the doctrines that divide the members would seem, well, divisive. It just seems so prudent to avoid such issues and talk about what the church agrees on. But avoiding the conflict is the surest road to division. Read more »

Pacifism: In Answer to Tim’s and Guy’s Questions

pacifismAs usual, Tim has posed a number of thoughtful, challenging questions. I post my answers here because he’s pushed me to address some questions I was planning on getting to in future posts. I add my answer to Guy’s post on lobbying the government at the end because of the importance of the topic.

[PS -- I've been very impressed with quality and spirit of nearly all the comments. This has been a much better discussion than I'd ever imagined. I'm being pushed to figure out stuff every day.]

Tim wrote,

I still believe that the defensive wars of the times of the judges had to do with the Promised Land.

The examples from the Old Testament were intended to be illustrative of what God created government — all government — to do. If government doesn’t defend us from invaders and protect us from criminals, it’s not performing its God-ordained task (Rom 13:1-7).

I can’t imagine that God meant for his children to allow non-Christians to risk their lives to defend Christians. It would seem very unfair for the Christians to let others do their dirty work for them. Read more »

It’s Friday! Must be Time for a COMMERCIAL!!

And so, does honesty actually sell? What would happen if the church offered honest advertisements?

(Mat 10:34-39)  “Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword. 35 For I have come to turn “‘a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law– 36 a man’s enemies will be the members of his own household.’

37 “Anyone who loves his father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; anyone who loves his son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me; 38 and anyone who does not take his cross and follow me is not worthy of me. 39 Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it.”

Na – a – ah … Not a chance … We need to sell relationships and free use of the gym instead. Now that will change the world!!

Overseeing the Moderate Church: Part 2

Divided churchIn Part 1, we considered the difficulties of managing a moderate church, that is, a church that is divided between progressives and conservatives. While it’s not inevitable that such churches divide, they often do. The reason is almost always a failure of the leadership to confront the problem. Rather, most churches decide to delay the day of reckoning, piling political compromise on top of political compromise, until one day the church collapses. Read more »

Pacifism: Police and Defensive War, Part 1

pacifismJohn Howard Yoder argues that Christian pacifism should reject service in the military but not the police. After all, until Jesus returns, it’s obvious that life would be pretty awful for everyone if there were no police. The difference between the police and the military, he argues, is that the police don’t have the taking of life as a goal and are subject to strict oversight, with their actions being under guidelines reviewable by the courts. And that’s not an entirely unfair distinction. But it’s not entirely accurate either.

First, let’s begin with a little political science history. Why do we have government at all? By and large, government began back when humans began to plant fields. The invention of agriculture led to stationary villages and farms – and abundant food and other goods that could be easily stolen.

When some kings (of cities) raided Sodom and Gomorrah to take their possessions, it was not a war of conquest but of greed. It’s easier to steal than to work. And Abraham raised an army to get the goods back. Read more »