The “Gospel Advocate” Creed, Part 2

Angel with harpThe February 2007 issue of the Gospel Advocate includes an editorial by the owner and editor, Neil Anderson, commenting the decision by the Richland Hills Church of Christ to add an instrumental service. They will continue to offer two a cappella services.

Br. Anderson twice declares instrumental music in worship not only error, but “apostasy.” “Apostasy” is an anglicized form of the Greek “apostasia,” translated “rebellion” in 2 Thes. 2:3, referring to the “son of perdition” (KJV) or “man of lawlessness” (NIV). In short, Br. Anderson is unambiguously declaring the Richland Hills Church of Christ damned for their decision to have an instrumental worship service.

He concludes that “we must reject every compromise that leads away from the clear teaching of the Bible.” I’m sorry, but just where is it in the Bible that the necessity of a cappella music is a “clear teaching”? Don’t we argue from silence? And silence is not a clear teaching. It is, in fact, silence.

Perhaps the “clear teaching” is that we should not do things in worship that are unauthorized, but I’ve not seen that verse either. Both arguments are inferences from scripture, and neither is either clear or a teaching.

It’s a sad day when we grossly overstate our arguments in order to damn our brothers in Christ. The case against the instrument has always been, at best, an inference built largely on the teachings of uninspired early Christians, being many of the same people who brought us infant baptism and celibacy. We really need to get back to the Bible and stop trying to damn based on Tertullian and Theodoret.

I highly recommend to your listening the three-part sermon series on the Richland Hills website, “Both/And.” It’s the best discussion of the subject I’ve ever heard. Don’t judge these people until you’ve heard their explanation for their decision.

Profile photo of Jay Guin

About Jay F Guin

My name is Jay Guin, and I’m a retired elder. I wrote The Holy Spirit and Revolutionary Grace about 18 years ago. I’ve spoken at the Pepperdine, Lipscomb, ACU, Harding, and Tulsa lectureships and at ElderLink. My wife’s name is Denise, and I have four sons, Chris, Jonathan, Tyler, and Philip. I have two grandchildren. And I practice law.
This entry was posted in Gospel Advocate, Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

0 Responses to The “Gospel Advocate” Creed, Part 2

  1. Ken Sublett says:

    Does it matter what the reasoning is if they lie about all of the Bible and recorded history?
    I would call lying ABOUT God and lying TO God about as apostate as one can get.
    Thanks: listen to the sermon and CHECK the proof texts. They are all wrong but that comes as no surprise since the postmoderns have declared the Bible flawed and fragmented.

    Thanks. and think about whether you want to endorse those sermons.

Leave a Reply