The Holy Spirit: Questions by Hank, Part 2

Hank asked,

But, according to your view, how could people in Isa and Acts 7 actually resist the HS when they didn’t even have him to begin with? And, assuming they were actually able to obey him rather than resist…how could they even want to if such requires the HS being personally in them first?

Hank,

Obviously, the Spirit can seek to change or persuade men by multiple means. If the question is: How can someone resist deity, such as the Spirit? The answer is that people do it every day — and those are examples. If the question is how can we resist the Spirit while he indwells us, the answer continues to be found in such passages as —

(Eph 4:30 ESV) 30 And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption.

(1Th 5:19 ESV) 19 Do not quench the Spirit.

— which are directed to Christians, in whom the Spirit dwells.

1. Throughout the OT God spoke of himself and described himself as “dwelling” in/at/between certain places that we understand as figurative as opposed to the idea that God was literally and personally taking up residence in said places. Even though he plainly said that he was (or would be) “dwelling” there. One example: 1 Sam. 4:4 — So the people sent to Shiloh, that they might bring from thence the ark of the covenant of the LORD of hosts, which dwelleth #3427 [between] the cherubims: and the two sons of Eli, Hophni and Phinehas, there with the ark of the covenant of God. I don’t believe that God was himself personally sitting down, enthroned upon, and living on the top of that ark up until it was stolen (we know that when the Philistines captured the ark, that it was not necessary for God to personally get up and leave). Scores of similar examples could be given.

As I’ve shown in Part 1, God can have a special presence in one place and yet still be omnipresent. That’s what the Bible teaches. You seem to insist that he is either in just one place or every place, that he can’t be both. But he quite plainly can be.

When God took human form and walked with Abraham, he was still omnipresent and still in heaven, too. And he literally walked with Abraham. These are not contradictory claims because God is not a finite being.

(Gen 18:1 NAS) Now the LORD appeared to him by the oaks of Mamre, while he was sitting at the tent door in the heat of the day.

(Gen 18:13-14 NAS) 13 And the LORD said to Abraham, “Why did Sarah laugh, saying, ‘Shall I indeed bear a child, when I am so old?’ 14 “Is anything too difficult for the LORD? At the appointed time I will return to you, at this time next year, and Sarah will have a son.”

Now, regarding 1 Sam 4:4 —

(1Sa 4:4 ESV) 4 So the people sent to Shiloh and brought from there the ark of the covenant of the LORD of hosts, who is enthroned on the cherubim. And the two sons of Eli, Hophni and Phinehas, were there with the ark of the covenant of God.

You seem to forget this language comes straight from the Torah —

(Exo 25:22 ESV) 22 There I will meet with you, and from above the mercy seat, from between the two cherubim that are on the ark of the testimony, I will speak with you about all that I will give you in commandment for the people of Israel.

(Exo 29:42-46 ESV) 42 It shall be a regular burnt offering throughout your generations at the entrance of the tent of meeting before the LORD, where I will meet with you, to speak to you there. 43 There I will meet with the people of Israel, and it shall be sanctified by my glory. 44 I will consecrate the tent of meeting and the altar. Aaron also and his sons I will consecrate to serve me as priests. 45 I will dwell among the people of Israel and will be their God. 46 And they shall know that I am the LORD their God, who brought them out of the land of Egypt that I might dwell among them. I am the LORD their God.

(Exo 30:6 ESV) 6 And you shall put it in front of the veil that is above the ark of the testimony, in front of the mercy seat that is above the testimony, where I will meet with you.

(Exo 40:33-38 ESV) 33 And he erected the court around the tabernacle and the altar, and set up the screen of the gate of the court. So Moses finished the work. 34 Then the cloud covered the tent of meeting, and the glory of the LORD filled the tabernacle. 35 And Moses was not able to enter the tent of meeting because the cloud settled on it, and the glory of the LORD filled the tabernacle. 36 Throughout all their journeys, whenever the cloud was taken up from over the tabernacle, the people of Israel would set out. 37 But if the cloud was not taken up, then they did not set out till the day that it was taken up. 38 For the cloud of the LORD was on the tabernacle by day, and fire was in it by night, in the sight of all the house of Israel throughout all their journeys.

(Lev 9:23-24 ESV) 23 And Moses and Aaron went into the tent of meeting, and when they came out they blessed the people, and the glory of the LORD appeared to all the people. 24 And fire came out from before the LORD and consumed the burnt offering and the pieces of fat on the altar, and when all the people saw it, they shouted and fell on their faces.

(Lev 16:12-13 ESV) 12 And he shall take a censer full of coals of fire from the altar before the LORD, and two handfuls of sweet incense beaten small, and he shall bring it inside the veil 13 and put the incense on the fire before the LORD, that the cloud of the incense may cover the mercy seat that is over the testimony, so that he does not die.

(Num 7:89 ESV) 89 And when Moses went into the tent of meeting to speak with the LORD, he heard the voice speaking to him from above the mercy seat that was on the ark of the testimony, from between the two cherubim; and it spoke to him.

(Num 16:42-45 ESV) 42 And when the congregation had assembled against Moses and against Aaron, they turned toward the tent of meeting. And behold, the cloud covered it, and the glory of the LORD appeared. 43 And Moses and Aaron came to the front of the tent of meeting, 44 and the LORD spoke to Moses, saying, 45 “Get away from the midst of this congregation, that I may consume them in a moment.” And they fell on their faces.

(Num 20:6-8 ESV) 6 Then Moses and Aaron went from the presence of the assembly to the entrance of the tent of meeting and fell on their faces. And the glory of the LORD appeared to them, 7 and the LORD spoke to Moses, saying, 8 “Take the staff, and assemble the congregation, you and Aaron your brother, and tell the rock before their eyes to yield its water. So you shall bring water out of the rock for them and give drink to the congregation and their cattle.”

As shown in these (and other) verses and in the texts quoted in the main post, it’s plain that God had a special presence or “dwelling” above the ark. He really did. The mercy seat was, in essence, the throne of God.

(Psa 99:1-2 ESV) The LORD reigns; let the peoples tremble! He sits enthroned upon the cherubim; let the earth quake! 2 The LORD is great in Zion; he is exalted over all the peoples.

Now, we can be too literal, of course, and picture God somehow confined by time and space to the top of the ark, and that is, of course, not right at all — as Solomon made clear at the dedication of the temple. But we can too figurative and imagine that God has no real time-and-space special connection to the ark, and that wouldn’t be right either.

The text is clear that God had a special presence there and that he spoke to Moses from that physical location — although God could certainly speak to Moses anywhere he pleases. He chose to make the mercy seat above the ark the center of his communications. He wanted the people to think of him having a special dwelling there.

The same was later true of the temple until the Glory of God left the temple as described in Ezekiel.

(Eze 11:22-23 ESV) 22 Then the cherubim lifted up their wings, with the wheels beside them, and the glory of the God of Israel was over them.  23 And the glory of the LORD went up from the midst of the city and stood on the mountain that is on the east side of the city.

The special presence of God there was a sign that the Israelites were God’s people and that he communicated with them in a special way. And the Glory of God is shown as leaving the temple when God allowed Nebuchadnezzar to destroy the city and the temple.

Obviously the image of the cherubs and mercy seat were powerful images in the Jewish mind and used in poetry and apocalyptic writing. The language sometimes truly is figurative at times. Of course. But the use of figurative language at times hardly means it’s always figurative.

In such cases, I believe that when we read that deity was “in” or “on” or “near” a certain person, place or thing…that it was his influence or blessings etc., that are being referred to. Just like when Jesus said that he was “in” his disciples in Jn. 15 (and that they were “in” him as well). Nobody understands that to be any type of “personal indwelling.” This is/was the normal way of understanding this up until the promises and work of the Spirit. For some reason, when it comes to the Spirit being “in” a believer….it just has to be deity personally and actually “residing”, and I don’t see why? Why not understand such passages consistent with the way we understand God “dwelling” between the cheribums, and with Jesus abiding “in” his disciples?

I readily grant that the language is sometimes figurative of God’s influence or blessings. But it’s a mistake to say that therefore it’s always a mere figure. Abraham would be one counter-example. God sat in Abraham’s tent and spoke to him in human form. He dwelled with Abraham in the fullest, truest, most literal sense of the word, and yet God was not only in his tent.

And, if I am right, it does not prevent the Spirit from blessing me with any so called “direct operation.” For clearly, men and women were able to resist and/or obey the Spirit before and without having any type of personal indwelling whatsoever (ie, Isa. 63 & Acts 7).

Yes, God can operate directly on our hearts by whatever means he chooses. But one means he chooses is through a personal indwelling — but not only by that means.

Now, obviously, if one were to cut open a living Christian, he wouldn’t find the Holy Spirit. We shouldn’t be that literal (which is how I understood it in the third grade). But there is still a sense in which the Spirit relates to a Christian that is unique to Christians and that is best described as being “in” the Christian. It means, at the least, a direct, powerful connection between our hearts and minds and the Spirit — not mediated by a book or a human. I discussed this in some depth at “Going Deeper into the Holy Spirit,” and I won’t repeat all that material here.

Because the Spirit is working directly on our hearts and minds, and because these things are literally in us, the Spirit must be in us in a similar sense while it’s doing this.

Finally, I would be very interested in reading what you have to say about:
1. Whether or not individual believers can determine to be “more filled” with the Spirit this year than they were last year? And are recent converts just “as filled” with the Spirit as are the faithful believers of years and years (do all believers have the Spirit equally)?

Absolutely. The scriptures repeatedly urge us to “be filled with the Spirit” — which obviously means we might somehow cooperate with the Spirit’s work within us.

(Eph 5:18-21 ESV) 18 And do not get drunk with wine, for that is debauchery, but be filled with the Spirit, 19 addressing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody to the Lord with your heart, 20 giving thanks always and for everything to God the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, 21 submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ.

“Be filled” is passive but parallels “do not get drunk.” Paul is speaking of volitional actions but in the passive voice. You see, only God can fill us, but we can submit to it. It’s the same paradox we see in —

(Phi 2:12-13 ESV) 12 Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, so now, not only as in my presence but much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling, 13 for it is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure.

We must “work out” our salvation, even though “it is God who works” in us to “will and to work for his good pleasure.” “Will” refer to our volition — our desires. God works in us to change what we want and therefore what we do — but we must work with God. And it’s in working with God that we can be more filled with the Spirit next year than this.

Of course, we’re either indwelt or we’re not, either saved or not. But the degree to which our wills are conformed to God’s, the degree to we are restored to his image, changes as we mature in Christ in response to God’s work within us.

2. Is it possible for the Spirit to depart from within a believer?

Absolutely. “Quench the Spirit” in 1Th 5:19 is a poor translation. The word means to put out a fire. We usually use “quench” to refer to quenching a thirst — which comes back quickly and easily. An extinguished fire is dead and done. The same thought shows up in —

(Heb 6:4-6 ESV) 4 For it is impossible, in the case of those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, 6 and then have fallen away, to restore them again to repentance, since they are crucifying once again the Son of God to their own harm and holding him up to contempt.

(Heb 10:26-31 ESV) 26 For if we go on sinning deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, 27 but a fearful expectation of judgment, and a fury of fire that will consume the adversaries. 28 Anyone who has set aside the law of Moses dies without mercy on the evidence of two or three witnesses. 29 How much worse punishment, do you think, will be deserved by the one who has spurned the Son of God, and has profaned the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and has outraged the Spirit of grace? 30 For we know him who said, “Vengeance is mine; I will repay.” And again, “The Lord will judge his people.” 31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.

Jude describes people who appear to have once been saved but are now “devoid of the Spirit.”

(Jud 1:5-19 ESV) 5 Now I want to remind you, although you once fully knew it, that Jesus, who saved a people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed those who did not believe. 6 And the angels who did not stay within their own position of authority, but left their proper dwelling, he has kept in eternal chains under gloomy darkness until the judgment of the great day– 7 just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire. … 17 But you must remember, beloved, the predictions of the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ. 18 They said to you, “In the last time there will be scoffers, following their own ungodly passions.” 19 It is these who cause divisions, worldly people, devoid of the Spirit.

So, no, I don’t teach once saved always saved or the perseverance of the saints. And as all who have the Spirit are saved (Rom 8:9-11), if someone falls away, he loses the Spirit.

About Jay F Guin

My name is Jay Guin, and I’m a retired elder. I wrote The Holy Spirit and Revolutionary Grace about 18 years ago. I’ve spoken at the Pepperdine, Lipscomb, ACU, Harding, and Tulsa lectureships and at ElderLink. My wife’s name is Denise, and I have four sons, Chris, Jonathan, Tyler, and Philip. I have two grandchildren. And I practice law.
This entry was posted in Holy Spirit and Providence, Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

15 Responses to The Holy Spirit: Questions by Hank, Part 2

  1. hank says:

    Thanks Jay. I really appreciate you taking the time to write all that. I think we might be closer than I thought. I especially liked how you put it when you said we at least have a direct and powerful connection between our hearts and mind and his. I am comfortable saying it like that. I hope that you have a better understanding of my view as well. while not believing in a "personal" indwelling, I don't limit God to his written revelation. I just don't see God as "personally" here and not there and stuff like that (as if he travels, stays awhile, leaves, etc.) – believe that he just "is" and that it is his influence, power, judgment, blessings, etc being spoken of rather than his "actual person". A deep and interesting subject for sure. Thanks for your thoughts…

  2. hank says:

    Thanks for taking the time to write all of that Jay, good thoughts. I particularly liked the part about there being a direct and powerful connection between our hearts and minds and his. I am comfortable saying it like that. I hope you understand my view better and that just because I don't believe in a "personal" indwelling, it does not mean that I limit God to working only through his written revelation. I just don't understand God to be "personally in" one person place or thing and not the other. I believe it is his bleesings, judgemnet, power, etc., that are spoken of. I don't believe God ever "personally" leaves one place and travels (moves, etc,) to another. I believe that he just "is". At any rate, thanks again for your time. Good day bro

  3. Hank says:

    My dumb phone made it appear as though my 1st reply didn't make it. Sorr bout the duplicate all

  4. Laymond says:

    Jay, I have been trying to say this in a way that won't bring as much or more disagreement than the idea of God indwelling the human body. this subject is almost as controversial as why would the spirit indwell such an undesirable body as the sinful body of us humans.

    The closest example I can come up with is the war in Afghanistan, we see ever day on TV that the United States is in Afghanistan to rid that country of undesirable characters, that hate us.
    We know that the country of The United States has not moved one inch. We also know that we are said to be in other countries around the world, just as you say God can be many places at once, America is in many places at once also. but not literally, we are represented, and have influence across the world. We are seen by others by the way our representatives act.
    And our actions influence other countries to want to be like us.
    But America is not in Afghanistan, or any other country.

  5. Larry Short says:

    Laymond, there is a difference. The US or its people are not ominpresent. God can be in North America and Asia completely at the same time. He can be in every beleiver and entroned in heaven at the same time!

  6. Larry Short says:

    Hank, I am almost the opposite of you because:
    Acts 17: 24 "The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by hands. 25 And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything. Rather, he himself gives everyone life and breath and everything else. 26 From one man he made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands. 27 God did this so that they would seek him and perhaps reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from any one of us. 28 'For in him we live and move and have our being.' As some of your own poets have said, 'We are his offspring.' [[TNIV, ibs.org]
    Taken to a literal extreme v28 suggests there is no life apart from God. If we move, breathe, etc. it is God empowered. So, instead of limiting God's presence, it is probably more pervasive that either of us imagined!

  7. hank says:

    Hi Larry,

    God made all things, gave to all things life, and people were "in him and lived and moved and had their being" way before anybody believed God had to personally be in a person himself literally to do any of that.

    By the way, when the Bible says that we are in Christ and when it says that we are in God, I wonder in what sense people understand that. Like when Jesus told his disciples that he was in them and that they were in him…we all understand that to be figurative (just like when God was on the ark or in the temple)….I just don't see why everything changes when it comes to the Holy Spirit. Why not just be consistent throughout?

  8. Larry Short says:

    Hank, well said. Honestly, what is in? Many crave a physical presence but I see it more at a spiritual. Does God have to be physically at the ark to speak? I don't see why. The Holy Spirit may live in us, but I doubt it will show on a current or future medical scan.
    The most common relationship of us and God in the Bible is fatherhood. While my physical father contributed DNA, his greatest contribuytion was teaching by example. Again that contribution is not on the medical scan. So, like God's presence, I am affected but the source would be undetected.

  9. Laymond says:

    Larry said, "Laymond, there is a difference. The US or its people are not omnipresent. God can be in North America and Asia completely at the same time. He can be in every believer and enthroned in heaven at the same time"
    Larry, How does God indwell all these places at once?
    As the bible plainly teaches it is through, belief, faith, and another person's word, and the acceptance of that word as truth. That is what we have, no proof, whether we accept it or not. Those who claim guidance by the indwelling spirit, would never have heard of that spirit if not for the belief and faith of those who wrote the bible.
    As for God's omnipresents , I believe it is said that God is not in non-believers.Although it is said his law is.

  10. Hank says:

    Thanks Larry, yeah — what is "in"? Great question. I just think its most consistent to interpret it all the same. The Holy Spirit is "in" us in the same way that Jesus was "in" his disciples when he told them he was back in John 15. Just as God was "in" the temple made by hands etc. There really is no need to make the word be all of a sudden different once we read about the Spirit being "in" us today.

  11. Larry Short says:

    Laymond, proof of omipresence or indewelling is tough in a scientific sense. Read above the Acts especially v28. Is it possible that the only reason everyone that is alive, is because they have a spark of God in them? I not stating that as what Paul taught but it was a possibility. Perhaps the soul isn't acquired by phsical reproduction but God breathed everytime like Adam. Just consider. Someday this will all be known or we will have lost interest!

  12. Laymond says:

    Larry, the vs to which you refer, comes after Paul is comparing his God with the Greek Gods. After, he explains everything was created by the God of creation, he said
    Act 17:28 For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.
    The word ( en,) which in this case was translated "in" could have been translated "by" or "through" which in either case I believe would have been the way to go.
    For ( through him we live), or (by him we live) would have held the conversation within context.
    This same word has been translated (By or through) many times in scripture.

  13. Larry Short says:

    Laymond, thanks for the exegesis. Either way that plus the creation of man, God breathed Adam to become a living being (a step added not with the animals, plants, and other life). That plus by God we have life in Acts coud be part of the soul of man. C.S. Lewis related the earlier verses, that we seek God, to be an innate proof of divinity.
    Revelation gives a picture of a God active in human affairs. So maybe by Him we live means this moment. Alternately, God could just wind the creation clock, and everything comes automatically since. Either way it remains true by God.
    None of this changes core beleifs. Personally I store up the possibilities but keep an open mind for other views. I am a little surprised by anyone who has figured this all out with so few revelations.

  14. Laymond says:

    Larry, I am not one " who has figured this all out "
    But I do not strive to make it more difficult to understand than it already is either.

    I don't try to teach something, then turn around and say , but I don't really know what I'm talking about.
    I try to accept the bible as if it were written to inform the common man, because it was.

  15. Larry Short says:

    Laymond, sorry I didnt mean you for people teaching from little facts. Actually, the modern best sellers of Di Vinci Code, Left Behind, etc. are part of what I had in mind.
    Hank had an interesting idea, that the entire nature of the presence of God does not require rewrititng to accomodate the indwelling Holy Spirit. I tend to be conservative about manifestations of God. However I am not close minded to major actions of God in our world. Probably most of what God does goes unnoticed by most of us.

Comments are closed.