Dan Bouchelle: Walking in the Reign

walkinginthereignNot too long ago, I asked my readers at OneInJesus to recommend other Restoration Movement bloggers.

Dan Bouchelle appeared near the top of the list and yet I didn’t know he’d begun blogging. I have since become a dedicated reader.

I was already very familiar with Mission Resource Network, which Dan is president of. MRN is a ministry that helps send missionaries and plant churches across the world. My own congregation has frequently sought their advice on missions oversight questions.

(Every church should. These guys are just incredibly knowledgeable, wise, and helpful when it comes to missions.)

Dan used to blog at Confessions of a Former Preacher, where he’d built up a loyal audience with excellent articles. But in June 2013, he relocated to Walking in the Reign, which has a more boring sedate title. Nonetheless, the excellence has continued.

To give you a sense of his work, I need to introduce you to a series of his posts —

Short Term Missions: Triumph or Tragedy

Doing Short Term Missions Well, Part 1

Doing Short Term Missions Well, Part 2

This is from the first of the three posts —

_______________________

  • “American churches look incredibly wasteful to believers in other countries. We spend thousands of dollars to fly large groups of people to poor countries to do manual labor projects in a place were people with the required skills are begging for work. With a fraction of the money we spend on trips, the local churches could hire the work they need done with better quality, build the local economy, and establish relationships with prospective converts. I heard recently of one church in Mexico that was repainted six times in one summer by different youth groups from different American churches.”
  • “Please tell the American church to stop sending us their children. We want partnership with American churches, but we need dialogue with mature leaders who can provide us with perspective and coaching to solve our own problems. Baby sitting youth groups may help them, but they create a burden on us. When they are here, we have to shut down everything to get them around and keep them busy with projects they can do without speaking the language. We can’t turn them down when they ask to come because we need the financial support that comes from their churches, but we don’t get much benefit from them being here and they cost us a great deal.”
  • “For the first time in history, missions is being done primarily for the benefit it provides for those who go instead of those to whom they are sent.”

There are few issues more complex and more frustrating for the global church than short term missions. They have become a $2 billion annual industry for the American church and the results are mixed. How should we view short term missions? How can we do STM in a way that maximizes their benefit and avoids creating self-serving problems?

_______________________

I confess that I edited out Dan’s positive comments re short term missions. You’ll have to go to the original posts for those. Besides, it was the final bullet that hit me in the gut.

Good, real, practical advice that every church leader needs to read.

About Jay F Guin

My name is Jay Guin, and I’m a retired elder. I wrote The Holy Spirit and Revolutionary Grace about 18 years ago. I’ve spoken at the Pepperdine, Lipscomb, ACU, Harding, and Tulsa lectureships and at ElderLink. My wife’s name is Denise, and I have four sons, Chris, Jonathan, Tyler, and Philip. I have two grandchildren. And I practice law.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Dan Bouchelle: Walking in the Reign

  1. John says:

    The paragraph about the American churches sending their children is brutally, and so BEAUTIFULLY honest!

    But the modern American church has always had a “delegating” way of working. Meaning “If we bring in someone to do it, then we did it”. I saw it back in the seventies and eighties when many elderships brought in young people from the Crossroads movement which later became the Boston movement. Elders who never practiced discipling themselves saw it as a chance to “do it without doing it”. Of course later on when they had eighteen year olds telling them how to raise their children most of them realized, “Maybe this wasn’t such a good idea”.

    “Easy and cheap” usually backfires.

  2. Alabama John says:

    As any business man knows it would be far more effecent to just send the money instead of the children to get any job done in a foreign country.

    We may forget this act is very much an apprentice program as well for our children and teaching them to serve is a BIG part of this to many of us.

    I don’t care if ther church ever gets paint. Do care that our children want to go paint it.

    The children that go will soon be the leaders that will control the money that is needed and the knowing the local folks they meet while painting will sure cause them to send money to that location.

    Don’t be shortsighted!!!

  3. Al P. says:

    Jay – I read often but comment seldom. This one struck a chord, however. If I remember my history of the Restoration Movement correctly, I believe that one of the issues that caused the split was the Missionary Societies. Maybe not exactly the same function as MRN but it sure seems that the Churches of Christ have accepted what they condemned in others so many years ago. Just thinking. :>)
    And I’m thinking of myself when I say “slow learner” because it took me 60+ years.

  4. alegler says:

    Dan filled in as a interim preacher for a couple of months at the church we attend. He has a gift of grabbing your attention and telling you exactly what needs to be said in a direct manner while not offending you because you know he speaks truth.

Comments are closed.